From the Daily Mail in the UK
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1347148/Woman-26-poses-man-9-years-trick-TWO-women-having-sexual-relations.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1347148/Woman-26-poses-man-9-years-trick-TWO-women-having-sexual-relations.html)
'A woman yesterday denied tricking two women into sexual intimacy by pretending to be a man.
In an elaborate ruse, Samantha Brooks, 26, is accused of posing as a man called Lee Brooks in order to have sexual contact with them.
This went on for eight years with one woman and then eight months with the other, it is claimed.
She is even alleged to have proposed to one woman.
I'm wondering if there could have been an element of ->-bleeped-<- there but there is no word of it.
views/ opinions?
If not ->-bleeped-<-, then this is the best prank of all time.
Not that the Daily Mail might sensationalize any story, nope, not them.
Quote from: tekla on September 03, 2011, 10:13:37 AM
Not that the Daily Mail might sensationalize any story, nope, not them.
yeah, I did think about that fact :p
it is in other newspapers though to be fair