Susan's Place Transgender Resources

News and Events => Opinions & Editorials => Topic started by: SandraJane on January 16, 2012, 06:05:40 PM

Title: ->-bleeped-<-: An Evidence-Based Review
Post by: SandraJane on January 16, 2012, 06:05:40 PM
Cristans Research
My place to research trans history



->-bleeped-<-: An Evidence-Based Review


Posted on January 16, 2012, 1:07 am, by Cristan, under Terminology.

http://research.cristanwilliams.com/2012/01/16/->-bleeped-<--an-evidence-based-review/ (http://research.cristanwilliams.com/2012/01/16/-%3E-bleeped-%3C--an-evidence-based-review/)

"->-bleeped-<-" seems to be a contentious term within the GLBT community. For many in the trans community, we've known "->-bleeped-<-" to be a term associated with the gay (specifically gay male) community; a term used by gay men to talk about the trans experiences in a pithy, ironic or comical way. The term is usually spelled one of two ways: "->-bleeped-<-" or "->-bleeped-<-". Recently a number of notables have begun experiencing the ire of the trans community when the term is used in a public forum. The trans community asserts that "->-bleeped-<-" is a term akin to "->-bleeped-<-got". Some have asserted their right to use the term in public while others assert that the public use of the term is disrespectful.