Susan's Place Transgender Resources

Community Conversation => Female to male transsexual talk (FTM) => Transsexual talk => FTM Gear => Topic started by: insideontheoutside on May 28, 2012, 02:29:04 PM

Title: More realistic, smaller pack & play or just play
Post by: insideontheoutside on May 28, 2012, 02:29:04 PM
I know there's threads on here with reviews of prosthetics and I have looked at a few of them but everything I see either looks really off from the real thing or is HUGE. I don't want huge ... especially if it's pack and play. I know Peecock has something that's 4" but it doesn't look very realistic. There was another site I came across one day that wasn't the Tyron site (they may be realistic but it's way more than I'd ever want to spend on a dick and it's freakin' huge). I can't remember what it was.

I can't even find just a play model that is in the smaller size range and has some realistic look. Frustrating.
Title: Re: More realistic, smaller pack & play or just play
Post by: Adio on May 29, 2012, 08:55:13 AM
How small and how realistic?  Have you looked at just regular dildos?  Is the material important to you (cyberskin versus silicone, etc)?
Title: Re: More realistic, smaller pack & play or just play
Post by: NXTransit on May 29, 2012, 03:41:45 PM
I'm not sure if you have the money, but there's the lolajake site you can check out. They have pack, play, and pack&play. Some of their packers are on the smaller side.
http://lolajake.com/secure/portfolio/ (http://lolajake.com/secure/portfolio/)
Title: Re: More realistic, smaller pack & play or just play
Post by: insideontheoutside on May 30, 2012, 10:17:26 PM
5" or under would be fine. I checked out the lolajake site. Those look cool but I couldn't find any real info on there. Just a picture, price and color selection. Seemed odd they wouldn't put info like size.
Title: Re: More realistic, smaller pack & play or just play
Post by: insideontheoutside on May 30, 2012, 10:18:35 PM
Oh never mind, I finally found info on the lolajake site. The links are a little whack though. Kept clicking on stuff and nothing was happening before.
Title: Re: More realistic, smaller pack & play or just play
Post by: Adio on May 30, 2012, 10:47:22 PM
Personally, I would never buy any lolajake products.  Too many problems in the past with their products. 

I found several 5" or smaller ones online.  I'm going to PM you those though due to the site (sex toy shop).
Title: Re: More realistic, smaller pack & play or just play
Post by: Finn642 on June 01, 2012, 07:05:12 PM
I had a bad experience with lolajake, part of what was bad was that it was much larger than we wanted.

I got a reelmagik 4.5 with flex rod, it's small and works for packing and just big enough it can be used for sex. again it's small, definitely a flaccid penis size but it CAN be used for sex because of the rod, which bends nicely into place for both packing and sex.

its expensive, i bought mine when it was a bit cheaper and the shipping takes a long time but its the best packer i've seen.



Title: Re: More realistic, smaller pack & play or just play
Post by: Stealthy on June 02, 2012, 05:06:45 AM
Yeah-Reelmagik has a 4.5" one that's super-realistic (apparently, Reelmagik packers can pass as cis dicks). 'Expensive' is probably not a harsh enough term, though.
Title: Re: More realistic, smaller pack & play or just play
Post by: supremecatoverlord on June 02, 2012, 07:54:32 AM
Quote from: Stealthy on June 02, 2012, 05:06:45 AM
'Expensive' is probably not a harsh enough term, though.
If you have your own income and are able to set money aside, even something at is $1,000 dollars isn't that expensive - it all just depends on you manage money.
I'm not really sure what you're saying here.
Title: Re: More realistic, smaller pack & play or just play
Post by: Stealthy on June 02, 2012, 09:00:24 AM
It's $500 for a 4.5" packer, slightly more for the pack and play version, a few hundred more for the cis-esque version. Not everyone can just afford to spend that much on a packer.
Title: Re: More realistic, smaller pack & play or just play
Post by: supremecatoverlord on June 02, 2012, 09:14:32 AM
Quote from: Stealthy on June 02, 2012, 09:00:24 AM
It's $500 for a 4.5" packer, slightly more for the pack and play version, a few hundred more for the cis-esque version. Not everyone can just afford to spend that much on a packer.
Also, there's a difference between a regular packer and realistic prosthetic.
That was my point.
Yes, it's not dirt cheap, but I don't think saying that it's slightly more expensive than a regular packer (especially since you have the option of customizing it to your personal needs) is an understatement.
Title: Re: More realistic, smaller pack & play or just play
Post by: insideontheoutside on June 02, 2012, 01:31:06 PM
I'd say there's quite a difference in something that just resembles the general shape and color of an actual dick and a medical prosthetic that's got a lot more work put into it specifically to get as close as humanly possible to the real thing.

Personally the lolajake stuff is okay ... it's like middle of the road. I do thing they're a little too much for what they are (especially considering it seemed only 1 had 3D balls - for $500 I'd expect at least 3D balls on all of them).