It's coming guys!
I am at the Philly Trans Health Conference this weekend and they have a prototype with them. It is the flaccid 4.5 inch prosthetic. It is very simple, just the regular prosthetic hollowed out to pee through. Simple design. Not a 3 in 1, just a STP packer.
They say it will probably be 2-3 months before they start to produce them. He doesn't know the cost, but I would assume that it will be similar if not the same as the regular flaccid prosthetic.
I didn't ask if you could get it in a basic packer, but I am assuming not. I will ask tomorrow. He is also going to tell me the weight tomorrow, as he needs to look it up.
As an aside, if you are considering the human hair or synthetic hair, go with the human hair. It feels so much better and he says it is longer lasting.
Oh wow, Brett! That is really amazing! What's the receptacle like?
Quote from: Kreuzfidel on June 12, 2014, 07:15:28 PM
Oh wow, Brett! That is really amazing! What's the receptacle like?
Really, it is just a very simple design. You may have noticed that the back of their prosthetics have a place for the t-induced shaft to nestle. It uses that same size opening (maybe slightly bigger), and then for obvious reasons the space becomes a bit thinner out to the end of the shaft. Meaning, it is no different than if you made your own hole in the current prosthetic, really. It would look the same. The hole looks wide enough that if you have a thick stream, you will be ok.
The prosthetic does not feel "soft" or hollow. It feels just as solid as the other flaccids.
I suppose the assumption is that if you have it adhered you are "lined up", so to speak.
This is great!! I was anticipating a post from someone who was attending, so thanks!! :D Are they introducing anything else? Will the girth of the STP be larger? I hope so. :-\
Quote from: Ethedon on June 12, 2014, 08:53:32 PM
This is great!! I was anticipating a post from someone who was attending, so thanks!! :D Are they introducing anything else? Will the girth of the STP be larger? I hope so. :-\
Nothing else new.
Nope, it is the exact same as the regular flaccid. We do need to remember that it is a "prototype", however, so it could change.
Yea I guess things could change between 2-3 months. I would think the girth would be larger for a larger tubing to prevent back flow. I made an STP using my sailor and I never have any back flow.
So are you saying this can be adhered to your skin via medical adhesive?
Quote from: yaka on June 13, 2014, 02:59:10 AM
So are you saying this can be adhered to your skin via medical adhesive?
Yes, the prototype appears to be the exact same mold as the current prosthetic flaccid.
A cis friend of mine said he would trade his penis for a vagina (NSFW (http://tinyurl.com/kffezma)) as long as he wouldn't ovulate and could still pee standing up.
Quote from: dalebert on June 13, 2014, 09:42:37 AM
A cis friend of mine said he would trade his penis for a vagina (NSFW (http://tinyurl.com/kffezma)) as long as he wouldn't ovulate and could still pee standing up.
Wow why? If you don't mind me asking.
Quote from: Ethedon on June 13, 2014, 12:20:58 PM
Wow why? If you don't mind me asking.
Uhm... I can't recall his exact reasoning. There's a link to the whole episode in the video description. I'm sure it has at least a little more explanation.
That is awesome! I hope the stp version is also going to be lighter in weight since it is cored.
The STP prototype had two versions, if I recall correctly...one with single density testicles, and one with realistic testicles. They varied in weight a little. The guys said they'd tweak things and make decisions based on OUR feedback/desires, so if you want certain characteristics (like the adhesion tab, apparently that's up for debate, as well as the density of the testicles and a few other things...) definitely let them know.
They said it should be about the same price as the flaccid 4 inch prosthetic...that alone is amazing news...not having to pay extra.
This all sounds great. I've been looking for an stp that can adhere.
I went back to look at it again today. Seeing it next to the regular flaccid, I noticed the STP version is bigger. The tab seems bigger, too. I asked and found out that the shaft is 5.5 inches (sorry for my error in the first post). I would describe the receptable as being similar to the Go Girl. Pick up your flaccid RM and core it out in the shape of a Go Girl (that type funnel), and that would describe the look of the inside. Nowhereboi would you agree that this is a good way to describe it?
The would like to do the realistic testicles. The owner is currently on search for find a lighter set than what you has found available. Like Nowhereboi said, they ask people for their opinions.
Quote from: SX0877 on June 13, 2014, 03:16:53 PM
That is awesome! I hope the stp version is also going to be lighter in weight since it is cored.
The owner wasn't there to tell me today. I don't know anything about silicone, but it makes sense to me that the building up of the walls of the funnel is going to account for the silicone removed (if that makes any sense). Meaning, I think that it may not be significantly lighter.
Quote from: Brett on June 14, 2014, 03:52:58 PM
I went back to look at it again today. Seeing it next to the regular flaccid, I noticed the STP version is bigger. The tab seems bigger, too. I asked and found out that the shaft is 5.5 inches (sorry for my error in the first post). I would describe the receptable as being similar to the Go Girl. Pick up your flaccid RM and core it out in the shape of a Go Girl (that type funnel), and that would describe the look of the inside. Nowhereboi would you agree that this is a good way to describe it?
The would like to do the realistic testicles. The owner is currently on search for find a lighter set than what you has found available. Like Nowhereboi said, they ask people for their opinions.
Is the girth on the STP the same as the 4.5"? Did you get to actually feel the shaft?
I hope I don't come across as a party pooper but 4"+ is big for flaccid size. Most guys are growers. Just be careful with a 4"+ packer because you might get the attention of size queens. Do they even make them any smaller?
Quote from: Ethedon on June 14, 2014, 04:15:32 PM
Is the girth on the STP the same as the 4.5"? Did you get to actually feel the shaft?
I believe they are the same, but I didn't put them side by side. There isn't a noticeable difference if it is larger, and yes, I felt the shaft.
Quote from: dalebert on June 14, 2014, 06:00:22 PM
I hope I don't come across as a party pooper but 4"+ is big for flaccid size. Most guys are growers. Just be careful with a 4"+ packer because you might get the attention of size queens. Do they even make them any smaller?
Reel Magik does not make them smaller (Unfortunately. I prefer a 3.5 inch packer, myself).
I knew the guys here would be excited to hear about a RM STP, which is why I started the thread.
I am considering ordering an erect model for sex because they are nothing short of amazing.
I believe the shorter the packer the more of a bulge you get because it doesn't actually lay down. I think the 4.5" and 5.5" is perfect for me. I can't wait to see it. Do we just email our suggestions?
Quote from: Ethedon on June 14, 2014, 09:38:12 PM
I believe the shorter the packer the more of a bulge you get because it doesn't actually lay down. I think the 4.5" and 5.5" is perfect for me. I can't wait to see it. Do we just email our suggestions?
Since you seem so interested Ethedon I would email them and tell them you worked with them before and want to learn about the STP. Tell them you heard from some guys from the Philly conference about it. Or call them directly. As someone who has supported their company, I bet they would like to hear from you. They really did seem eager for opinions.
I think it would be awesome if they posted pictures on their website and asked opinions.
In terms of the length each of us like, I think it depends on how you wear the packer (what you put it in). I read guys talk about how the 3.5 sticks straight out, but that doesn't happen to me. I think whatever length the person like is the right length for them.
Quote from: Ethedon on June 14, 2014, 09:38:12 PM
I believe the shorter the packer the more of a bulge you get because it doesn't actually lay down.
I hadn't considered that. I can see what you mean now that I think about it.
Quote from: Brett on June 14, 2014, 03:52:58 PM
I went back to look at it again today. Seeing it next to the regular flaccid, I noticed the STP version is bigger. The tab seems bigger, too. I asked and found out that the shaft is 5.5 inches (sorry for my error in the first post). I would describe the receptable as being similar to the Go Girl. Pick up your flaccid RM and core it out in the shape of a Go Girl (that type funnel), and that would describe the look of the inside. Nowhereboi would you agree that this is a good way to describe it?
The would like to do the realistic testicles. The owner is currently on search for find a lighter set than what you has found available. Like Nowhereboi said, they ask people for their opinions.
Agreed...very much like the Go Girl, but it looks as if there's room to adapt it to other systems.
4 inches is big for flaccid but it's not out of the line insanely huge. I think the funnel arrangement looks a bit like the laboratory nine (later models), where the funnel piece is created partly by the balls. It's a prosthetic, so obviously it's different. It looks a bit like their 4 inch model. Now imo, it could be made into a 3 way. I said to Jesse, haha they all remembered me from last year, that you could put a rod in there. He said they weren't and I said "yeah but theoretically" and he agreed. Perhaps I put a bug in his ear. :)
To me they could also use the same model for a packer.
i thought it looked pretty nice, btw.
--Jay
For the people saying 4" is too big and might attract attention, I just want to say that post op I'm at about 5" and it doesn't look obscene. I always packed small with the same fear that you guys had, but unless you have a huge one, it's not gonna seem to big. I hardly have a noticable bulge except in gym shorts and sweats. Don't worry, your junk doesn't look as huge as you think.
I've packed with 4 inches and did it discretely, i.e I didn't really want someone to see a bulge. It's very doable. Their designs lay flat and down unlike say something like Mr Limpy where the shaft wants to stick straight up (of course mostly they aren't making packers). It's possible they could make this into a packer, but no immediate plans anyway.
--Jay
I think I would probably buy this. The Peacock gen 2 was a huge failure for me. I can't even use it.