Susan's Place Transgender Resources

Community Conversation => Female to male transsexual talk (FTM) => Transsexual talk => FTM Gear => Topic started by: makipu on October 19, 2015, 10:20:52 PM

Title: STP packer WITHOUT a harness secure?
Post by: makipu on October 19, 2015, 10:20:52 PM

Right now, I am looking for one that's STP and packer at the same time but most importantly, I would rather not use a harness because I find it inconvenient. Can't these types of packers safely stay in briefs or boxer briefs as well?

I was looking at this one in particular:

http://www.ftmessentials.com/collections/stp-devices/products/model-a-stp

Would you recommend it?
Title: Re: STP packer WITHOUT a harness secure?
Post by: Inji on October 20, 2015, 12:15:06 AM
I have the Model D (and the sport Model D as well). I find them difficult to pack with because the material is quite hard, and it tends to turn sideways when I move. I have to always reposition it...

the best STP I've packed without a harness is the EZP. It stays very nicely in place (I wear boxer briefs).
I've been packing with it during Martial Arts training, with all the movements and close-contact combats, it sits nicely in place.

I've also packed a Peecock but with a self-made harness (just an elastic band with a ring type), and have been fine with it with all the movements. I don't feel the harness at all, but just sometimes a bit worried others might see the harness...
Title: Re: STP packer WITHOUT a harness secure?
Post by: makipu on October 20, 2015, 10:20:10 AM
Thank you for that information, especially coming from someone who is active.
I think I will look more before I make the actual purchase then.
From reading the packer posts here, it seems that guys have to try quite a couple of them until finding a good match .
Title: Re: STP packer WITHOUT a harness secure?
Post by: Bimmer Guy on October 20, 2015, 10:34:30 PM
Quote from: makipu on October 19, 2015, 10:20:52 PM
I would rather not use a harness because I find it inconvenient.

Quote from: makipu on October 20, 2015, 10:20:10 AM
Thank you for that information, especially coming from someone who is active.


It's all about the EZP, man.  Created by an athletic, active man who wanted a STP that didn't require a harness and would work well during athletic pursuits.  Check it out.
Title: Re: STP packer WITHOUT a harness secure?
Post by: makipu on October 21, 2015, 09:53:09 AM
I was actually considering the EZP myself since yesterday after looking at bunch of reviews along with the ones from this forum. It seems to be out of stock though. Also,  I am a bit confused about how it actually stays inside the underwear though. When not peeing, where does the large opening actually stay, between the legs? Can this successfully work with boxer briefs ?
Title: Re: STP packer WITHOUT a harness secure?
Post by: maxman on October 21, 2015, 05:35:45 PM
I always wear a harness because it makes me feel secure. I do not like my junk shifting, falling, etc. I've been wearing them for a long time now and honestly with the right harness you don't even feel it. It just feels like a part of me. Adhesives can get messy and high-matinence with all the shaving and cleaning required (they get gross), and I don't like how loose a packer sits in underwear, especially when wanting a funnel to be in place to pee. I've reviewed a bunch on my blog (link in signature) if you'd like to check them out. The reviews are also on this site in various places. Best of luck, let me know if you have any questions about a product I've reviewed that I may be able to answer!