Perspectives on Human Male Pregnancy
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/58045
4/11/2008
"Probably since human existence, women, in the midst of labor pains and
all the other relative inconveniences of pregnancy, have often wished
that their husbands could help carry the load. Many women, especially
during labor, have wondered about the unfairness of being the sole
bearer of the pain. Why can´t he be the pregnant one? This thought has
seeped into the minds and out of the mouths of many women. However,
for better or for worse, wishing and reality can be very different
things."
"Reversal of what nature intended" also applies to getting a face lift,
Lasik surgery or even getting any type of life saving or altering
surgery. Initially humans lived to 33, is that what nature intended?
Pretty cruel nature is it....
Its only the attachement of pregnancy to the "feminine mystique" that makes
it sound different to her.
If they can make male pregnancy safe enough that its not some kind of
high risk gamble, then why not men, who are safe enough in their
masculinity to take this risk?
Against nature, why, just because mutations of human genome can't take us
to where other creatures went? That's just the luck of the draw, not
a preordained nature's law. Humans often are too eager to apply human ethics
to physical phenomena's to suit their own bias and views.
Maybe in 100000 years men would naturally be able to switch sex, who knows,
just imagine where were've come from in the last 100000 years!