Susan's Place Transgender Resources

Community Conversation => Crossdresser talk => Topic started by: Elwood on September 28, 2008, 08:47:10 PM

Title: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Elwood on September 28, 2008, 08:47:10 PM
This is sort of cross dressing, in a way, because I tend to dress masculinely. This is more like metrosexual, or maybe an expression of the gayer side of me. I don't know, but it was fun and I got a lot of dirty looks at the supermarket today. ;D And for more fun, I took my glasses off for these pictures.

(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi5.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fy168%2Fpenguin_furuba%2Fmoreblues.png&hash=018da64a6529d8984cfd2723caade6a3d5a1e674) (https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi5.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fy168%2Fpenguin_furuba%2Fnoglassesok1.png&hash=02165950f8da412ee5f831cd42ee9f4e303c5fd0)

It would have been more effective if I wore my tight-ish black jeans with it, but I just wore my normal guy jeans.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: findingreason on September 29, 2008, 12:17:46 AM
Teehee,

I like it, you look cool! You sooo look like a boy in that picture!
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: deviousxen on September 29, 2008, 01:21:41 AM
Handsome
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Jay on September 29, 2008, 02:32:11 AM
I like the pictures elwood you do pass. I think you pass better with out the glasses dude. I dress quite camp sometimes depends on what mood I am in to be honest!

But cool pics!
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Laura91 on September 29, 2008, 09:32:41 AM
You look really nice, elwood. I agree, you do look better without the glasses (but obviously you need them to see. How about changing frames or something?).
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Constance on September 29, 2008, 09:46:28 AM
I don't understand the use of the word "->-bleeped-<-" here, but you do look male to me.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Sephirah on September 29, 2008, 09:47:13 AM
Dan, did anyone ever tell you that you kinda look like a young Corey Feldman? Particularly without your glasses. Hmm... maybe it's just me. I think it's your eyes, and the shape of your mouth.

Definite resemblance. :)
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Nero on September 29, 2008, 09:51:02 AM
You do pass really well. Natural male features.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Yochanan on September 29, 2008, 09:54:20 AM
Quote from: Shades O'Grey on September 29, 2008, 09:46:28 AM
I don't understand the use of the word "->-bleeped-<-" here, but you do look male to me.

I find it kind of offensive.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Elwood on September 29, 2008, 12:05:12 PM
Thanks, guys. I am considering getting contacts.

For those who are confused by the use of the word "->-bleeped-<-," I believe it is quite okay for me to use it since I would ->-bleeped-<- men (that is, if I can find a way to block out the dysphoria related). The word is not one I use lightly, however, the choice was "queer" or "homo" or "->-bleeped-<-." Since queer was too general and I find homo more offensive, I stuck with the last one. Before you consider yourself a better thesaurus than me, consider that I had already taken into consideration the words "gay man" and "gay person" and "gay male" and "twink." Those, however, are more offensive. To say I was dressed like a "gay male" would mean I was perpetuation a horrific stereotype on ALL gay men. The word "->-bleeped-<-" narrows down to a particular group (namely, the stereotypical group) and thus was more appropriate in this context. "Twink" isn't even a word in my vocabulary, now that I have learned quite well what the word means.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: RebeccaFog on September 29, 2008, 12:05:40 PM
I think you look like a boy, by which I mean, young man. Teen boy. whatever.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Constance on September 29, 2008, 12:36:27 PM
Quote from: Elwood on September 29, 2008, 12:05:12 PM
For those who are confused by the use of the word "->-bleeped-<-," I believe it is quite okay for me to use it since I would ->-bleeped-<- men (that is, if I can find a way to block out the dysphoria related). The word is not one I use lightly, however, the choice was "queer" or "homo" or "->-bleeped-<-." Since queer was too general and I find homo more offensive, I stuck with the last one. Before you consider yourself a better thesaurus than me, consider that I had already taken into consideration the words "gay man" and "gay person" and "gay male" and "twink." Those, however, are more offensive. To say I was dressed like a "gay male" would mean I was perpetuation a horrific stereotype on ALL gay men. The word "->-bleeped-<-" narrows down to a particular group (namely, the stereotypical group) and thus was more appropriate in this context. "Twink" isn't even a word in my vocabulary, now that I have learned quite well what the word means.
OK, I get it now. Thanks for the clarification.

A friend of mine is a self-described middle-aged queen. The only time he uses the words "->-bleeped-<-" or "->-bleeped-<-got" is when describing the "pretty-boy ->-bleeped-<-s" that bother him so much. If I understand properly, I think he's using the term essentially the same way you are.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Pica Pica on September 29, 2008, 02:49:54 PM
of course in england, dressing like a ->-bleeped-<- means this:

(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2Fassets%2Fresources%2F2008%2F02%2Fcigarette-man.jpg&hash=134ce5882f77f61b662ed01585cd0aa8a666e301)

because a ->-bleeped-<- is a term for cigarette.

If you want to have a go here the terms; poof, nancy boy, screaming queen or dirty Omo are used.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: tekla on September 29, 2008, 02:51:26 PM
We do find it kind of funny when the Brit roadies want to know where to buy some ->-bleeped-<-s.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Pica Pica on September 29, 2008, 02:55:06 PM
especially when they are 'gasping' for one.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Constance on September 29, 2008, 03:05:48 PM
Quote from: Tekla
We do find it kind of funny when the Brit roadies want to know where to buy some ->-bleeped-<-s.
Quote from: Pica Pica
especially when they are 'gasping' for one.
LOL !
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: tekla on September 29, 2008, 03:11:12 PM
I tend to look at them all weird (not hard for me) and say "Funny you should ask that in San Francisco" at which point they get all like "Oh no mate, not like that, you know, a smoke."  Of course I've worked enough of those Brit types that I even know that when they say (OK, its the Scotts who really do it) "Oooot 'n aboot" that they mean 'out and about.'

Two cultures separated by a common language and all.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Pica Pica on September 29, 2008, 03:13:04 PM
Between the scots and the english it's seperation by a common language.
Between the english and the english - you must have met some geordies.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: tekla on September 29, 2008, 03:17:07 PM
I'll see your Scotts and Englishmen and raise you some Aussies, who not only speak it in a different way, but seem to have created an entire vocabulary that no one else gets either.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: RebeccaFog on September 29, 2008, 03:24:51 PM
smoking ->-bleeped-<-s in america is a hate crime.


Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Pica Pica on September 29, 2008, 03:25:23 PM
Too true,
but does it beat geordies

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YjNbyQ-71A (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YjNbyQ-71A)
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: tekla on September 29, 2008, 03:28:58 PM
OK, I'll bite, who are these people, where are they from, and what language are they singing in?
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Pica Pica on September 29, 2008, 03:36:06 PM
they are geordies, they come from the city of newcastle and they are singing in geordie.

'The dialect of Newcastle is known as Geordie, and contains a large amount of vocabulary and distinctive word pronunciations not used in other parts of England. The Geordie dialect has much of its origins in the language spoken by Anglo-Saxon mercenaries, who were employed by the Ancient British people to fight Pictish invaders, following the withdrawal of the Romans from Britain in the 4th century. This language was the forerunner of Modern English; but while the dialects of other English regions have been heavily altered by the influences of other foreign languages—particularly Latin and Norman–French—the Geordie dialect retains many elements of the old language'

we used to play a game in york only 72 miles from newcastle, are they geordie or are they dutch. the rule was, if they spoke english they were dutch.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: tekla on September 29, 2008, 03:42:38 PM
I'm so happy that the US is not burdened with history.  (we have some, we just ignore it)

But it does explain that famous Pink Floyd song "Several Species of Small Furry Animals Gathered Together in a Cave and Grooving with a Pict."
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Pica Pica on September 29, 2008, 03:45:01 PM
nothing explains pink floyd...

i just thought you may have met some, there are a great many geordie roadies.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: tekla on September 29, 2008, 03:51:27 PM
Because they were kicked out of their own land for failing to speak the language?  I might have, I know some who come from York, but praise the lord, never head them sing.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Pica Pica on September 29, 2008, 03:57:11 PM
well york is a completely different accent.
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: Jay on September 30, 2008, 04:48:18 AM
Quote from: tekla on September 29, 2008, 03:17:07 PM
I'll see your Scotts and Englishmen and raise you some Aussies, who not only speak it in a different way, but seem to have created an entire vocabulary that no one else gets either.

Yup yup very true!
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: deviousxen on September 30, 2008, 09:01:07 AM
Quote from: Pica Pica on September 29, 2008, 02:49:54 PM
of course in england, dressing like a ->-bleeped-<- means this:

(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2Fassets%2Fresources%2F2008%2F02%2Fcigarette-man.jpg&hash=134ce5882f77f61b662ed01585cd0aa8a666e301)

because a ->-bleeped-<- is a term for cigarette.

If you want to have a go here the terms; poof, nancy boy, screaming queen or dirty Omo are used.

EFFIN LULs
Title: Re: I dressed like a ->-bleeped-<- today.
Post by: barbie on October 04, 2008, 08:06:16 AM
Quote from: Elwood on September 28, 2008, 08:47:10 PM
This is sort of cross dressing, in a way, because I tend to dress masculinely. This is more like metrosexual, or maybe an expression of the gayer side of me. I don't know, but it was fun and I got a lot of dirty looks at the supermarket today. ;D And for more fun, I took my glasses off for these pictures.

Nowadays I think looking like a woman or a man is not so much critical. Looking palatable to people would be more important, whether you are a man or a woman. I see a lot of genuine girls who do not care about their appearance. And I see more men boast about their indifference to their neatness, not to mention hygiene.

Wearing fashionably is more important than passing. Your black hat and jacket are just fashionable. I guess most people in your area are not so much fashionable as you.

Barbie~~