I love fake essays. I just got this one from The Postmodernism Generator (http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo)
1. Discourses of dialectic
If one examines textual theory, one is faced with a choice: either reject postmodern construction or conclude that reality is capable of significance. It could be said that Foucault uses the term 'textual theory' to denote not, in fact, desituationism, but neodesituationism. The characteristic theme of Parry's[1] essay on structuralist discourse is the bridge between class and society.
In a sense, Bataille uses the term 'the posttextual paradigm of reality' to denote the futility, and subsequent dialectic, of postpatriarchial sexuality. The fatal flaw of Lacanist obscurity which is a central theme of Eco's Foucault's Pendulum emerges again in The Name of the Rose, although in a more self-sufficient sense.
It could be said that the premise of textual theory holds that class, ironically, has significance. Foucault promotes the use of Lacanist obscurity to challenge hierarchy.
2. Eco and textual theory
In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the distinction between feminine and masculine. Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a Lacanist obscurity that includes reality as a reality. An abundance of narratives concerning textual libertarianism may be discovered.
"Society is part of the dialectic of sexuality," says Baudrillard. In a sense, Sontag uses the term 'the posttextual paradigm of reality' to denote the role of the poet as reader. The main theme of the works of Eco is the defining characteristic, and some would say the rubicon, of neocultural consciousness.
Therefore, Drucker[2] implies that the works of Eco are not postmodern. The subject is contextualised into a textual theory that includes reality as a paradox.
However, Lyotard's model of Lacanist obscurity holds that consensus comes from the collective unconscious. Foucault suggests the use of textual theory to modify class.
It could be said that any number of desituationisms concerning not theory, as predialectic patriarchial theory suggests, but subtheory exist. The subject is interpolated into a textual theory that includes consciousness as a totality.
Therefore, the primary theme of Dietrich's[3] analysis of Lacanist obscurity is the role of the writer as artist. Lacan promotes the use of Marxist class to attack outdated, colonialist perceptions of reality.
3. Consensuses of economy
"Sexual identity is unattainable," says Bataille; however, according to von Junz[4] , it is not so much sexual identity that is unattainable, but rather the stasis, and eventually the absurdity, of sexual identity. But the premise of textual theory suggests that the raison d'etre of the poet is social comment, but only if the posttextual paradigm of reality is valid; otherwise, the law is part of the paradigm of culture. A number of narratives concerning textual theory may be revealed.
In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the concept of neotextual narrativity. Thus, Lacan suggests the use of Lacanist obscurity to deconstruct and analyse class. If cultural Marxism holds, we have to choose between the posttextual paradigm of reality and the presemiotic paradigm of expression.
However, the subject is contextualised into a dialectic nationalism that includes truth as a reality. Baudrillard promotes the use of Lacanist obscurity to challenge sexism.
Thus, de Selby[5] holds that we have to choose between textual theory and the postdeconstructivist paradigm of context. Marx suggests the use of Lacanist obscurity to read sexual identity.
It could be said that Debord uses the term 'textual theory' to denote the difference between class and art. If the posttextual paradigm of reality holds, we have to choose between cultural situationism and the neocapitalist paradigm of consensus.
4. Eco and textual theory
The characteristic theme of the works of Eco is the role of the observer as reader. However, the primary theme of Parry's[6] essay on the posttextual paradigm of reality is not narrative, but postnarrative. Dahmus[7] implies that we have to choose between textual theory and semantic desublimation.
In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between ground and figure. But the subject is interpolated into a posttextual paradigm of reality that includes language as a paradox. Sontag's analysis of textual theory holds that the goal of the participant is deconstruction.
Thus, Baudrillard uses the term 'the posttextual paradigm of reality' to denote the common ground between sexual identity and reality. The main theme of the works of Rushdie is the defining characteristic of neocultural sexual identity.
Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a deconstructive paradigm of context that includes truth as a whole. If the posttextual paradigm of reality holds, we have to choose between Lacanist obscurity and precapitalist narrative.
Thus, Foucault promotes the use of the posttextual paradigm of reality to attack capitalism. In The Moor's Last Sigh, Rushdie reiterates the semiotic paradigm of expression; in The Ground Beneath Her Feet, although, he examines Lacanist obscurity.
In a sense, any number of materialisms concerning not narrative as such, but neonarrative exist. Sontag suggests the use of predialectic rationalism to challenge and read consciousness.
The funny thing is...that's exactly what it's like trying to write an essay on postmodernism...it's all essentially meaningless.
Quote from: Helena on January 20, 2011, 01:58:03 PM
The funny thing is...that's exactly what it's like trying to write an essay on postmodernism...it's all essentially meaningless.
I heard that someone used one of these generators and turned in the result, and the teacher didn't realize it was fake....
It might just be an urban legend, though.