Gender Confusion: Sexual Anarchy's New Frontier
By Bob Ellis on February 24th, 2011
http://www.dakotavoice.com/2011/02/gender-confusion-sexual-anarchys-new-frontier/ (http://www.dakotavoice.com/2011/02/gender-confusion-sexual-anarchys-new-frontier/)
As we have seen over the past few days alone, "transsexuality" and "->-bleeped-<-" are becoming the new frontier of the sexual anarchists.
These proponents of anything-goes-sexuality have pushed for and are succeeding at getting businesses and insurance companies to pay for sex-reassignment mutilation surgeries. And in Massachusetts, Governor Deval Patrick is forcing all state agencies to embrace and affirm the sexual dysfunctions of transsexuality, cross-dressing, and other similar behaviors.
Sexual Anarchy is my new band name.
Quote from: tekla on February 25, 2011, 11:16:53 AM
Sexual Anarchy is my new band name.
I like it!
Our 1st hit song will be "Gender Confusion" ;D
Z
Quote from: Zythyra on February 25, 2011, 01:42:18 PM
Our 1st hit song will be "Gender Confusion" ;D
I assume that is the same song found on the hit album "Genital Mutilation"
QuoteSo why is homosexual behavior no longer listed in the manual of mental disorders? Did new scientific information come along to compel psychiatrists to de-list homosexuality? No. Did some new biological or genetic discovery come along which led psychologists to de-list homosexuality? No. Did compelling new clinical research come to light to motivate psychiatrists to de-list homosexuality? No. But political pressure did
.
Not that it will make a jot of difference to the writer, but to say any trait or behaviour is evidence of mental illness, it needs to be demonstrated that the behaviour is problematic for the individual.
That in itself, needs to be qualified. Homosexuality may be problematic for a homosexual, in that they may find themselves socially isolated. However, that does not mean homosexuality is a mental illness any more than a flag waving all American patriot, in the middle of Moscow or Tehran might find themselves socially isolated.
The necessity is to demonstrate, using clinical principals, that a set of conditions and traits are indicative of mental illness. Not the other way around.
So, to respond to the questions, Did new Scientific information emerge? No, because there was never any old scientific information. Did some biological or genetic discovery emerge? No, (at least, not in 1973), because there never was any old biological or genetic information. Did compelling new research come to light? Yes.
One Mr. Bob Ellis over there at this site is a real piece of classless work! So are the rest of his little minions!
Dawn
I don't think we are part of a Sexual Anarchy--- we're not that well organized!!
What he and others seem to miss is that with all that sex on their minds, aren't they the ones with the problems about it??? All of these folks are closet sexaholics. Process addictions including sex are also covered by the DSM quite well. They have not been de-listed.