Started by Lori Dee, Yesterday at 03:07:31 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Devlyn on Yesterday at 03:11:37 PMI was going to take a look, but it's paywalled to me.
Quote from: Devlyn on Yesterday at 03:16:10 PMYup
Quote from: Lori Dee on Yesterday at 03:07:31 PMUS Supreme Court rejects Massachusetts school gender-identity policy challengehttps://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-rejects-massachusetts-school-gender-identity-policy-challenge-2026-04-20/ 🔗Reuters - Andrew ChungApril 20, 20267:52 AM MDTThe U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a bid by parents to sue a public school district in Massachusetts over actions by teachers and officials to support the gender identity of students by not disclosing name or pronoun changes to parents without the child's consent.The parents said that "so-called gender transition" is harmful and that theirs is a moral objection, not a religious one. They are being represented at the Supreme Court by the Alliance Defending Freedom conservative Christian legal group.A federal judge threw out the case in 2022. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal in 2025, concluding that the parents had not sufficiently shown a deprivation of their parental rights, including to direct the medical care of their child.The 1st Circuit said it was "unconvinced that merely alleging Ludlow's use of gender-affirming pronouns or a gender-affirming name suffices to state a claim that the school provided medical treatment to the student."The deference by school officials to the wishes of students about whether to disclose their gender identity to parents allows the children to "express their identity without worrying about parental backlash," the 1st Circuit said.------------------------I don't know why the question mark icons are appearing in the text. It is not in the original text, nor in what I posted.
Quote from: Devlyn on Yesterday at 03:28:26 PMBtw, the question marks show up when I quote you, but I can remove them.