Susan's Place: 30 years of community, powered by people who believe transgender voices matter.
Started by TSJasmine, November 13, 2014, 03:04:45 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Squircle on November 14, 2014, 02:43:39 PMI've never been called it but I hate the word. It's most commonly used by prejudiced people (at least where I live) and sensationalist stories in the media. Fair enough it's not the worst thing to be called, but if someone were to shout it at me in the street I'd be looking for the quickest way out of the area because there'd be a good chance violence could follow.
Quote from: TSJasmine on November 13, 2014, 03:04:45 PMBeing called a ->-bleeped-<- hasn't & I don't feel it ever will bother me. I even call myself it sometimes. I don't view it as offensive & I never really have but I noticed a lot of people on here get offended when someone calls them a ->-bleeped-<- Why is that? What's so offensive about it? It's a slur somewhat but I can't see it in a negative context unless someone is like "OH SH**, THAT'S A ->-bleeped-<-!" or something rude like that. So I'm wondering , do you guys find it rude? Or are there a lot more like me who honestly just don't care?
Quote from: Jade_404 on November 15, 2014, 03:19:41 AMIf you let it bother you then they win. I learned that as a child. Brush it off. If they use it in a derogatory manner then they are ignorant. Stay away from them if you can. Ignorance is contagious don't fall into their trap.
Quote from: Squircle on November 15, 2014, 05:03:53 AMIf we ignore it and don't say as a community that this word isn't ok then they win, because they carry on using it, and they get to carry on 'othering' us.
Quote from: Tori on November 14, 2014, 05:44:36 PMIt really depends on context for me. I still use the term myself from time to time but I am very conscious of when or how I use it. Usually I use it is self deprecating and self referential ways. I have certainly changed my overall opinion of the word in the last few years. I used to see no harm in it at all. That has changed.
Quote from: Pikachu on November 13, 2014, 07:14:29 PMI honestly couldn't care less. It doesn't offend me. It's just a word. It's the context that counts. If someone were to use it in a disrespectful or malicious manner, then sure, that would bother me, because they were being disrespectful or malicious. If someone was innocuously using it in the place of 'transgender,' then it wouldn't bother me. Depending on the situation, I might tell them I prefer they refer to me as a trans girl, if it's necessary to bring my transgender status into the conversation at all. Otherwise I'd prefer they just address me as any other woman and leave any references to me being trans out of it.
Quote from: Jaime R D on November 15, 2014, 08:17:19 AMSimply put, I think it reduces you from a person to being a medical condition, dehumanizing and its most common use by those who don't accept us is to degrade someone, be they cis or trans. I don't care to hear it from trans people either. I figure if we don't want someone outside our community calling us that, regardless of the context, then we shouldn't either, you know, be a good example and all.
Quote from: Kaylee Angelia on November 14, 2014, 09:49:51 PMIt bothers me because I don't like being considered a catchy "label." I am me. I am a human being worthy of respect. I'm not a wop, chink, dago, jap, dink, ruskie, charlie, n****r, kafer, hood rat, sand n****r,spic, mick, kraut, block head, gook... You get the idea...When we relegate people to a derogatory label we degrade who they are...we degrade that special part of them that is unique...that spark of the Divine. We degrade the person...
Quote from: Jade_404 on November 15, 2014, 05:35:39 AMEven if we say as a community that it is wrong, they won't understand and still call us that, remember they are ignorant, we can't fix stupid.I have been called all kinds of things, I can't even remember how many times. I don't dwell on it and I don't let it effect me. And the word ->-bleeped-<- does not even sound that bad to me, I could list a bunch of worse vulgar names I have heard, ->-bleeped-<- is mild in comparison.
Quote from: Kamiki on November 15, 2014, 04:38:20 PMI have never been called such myself. But the word, to me, carries far too much baggage associated with fetishism, drag queens and she-male pornography for me to be comfortable with; as such it is a less than appealing word in every way, and is simply not cricket with me.Kami.