Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Straw/Strawman Argument

Started by melissa90299, December 01, 2007, 10:59:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

melissa90299

This is not an attempt to continue a locked topic merely but to explain what a straw argument is. I have found that those to the right on the political spectrum are most often guilty of trotting out straw arguments. My theory is that straw arguments don't seem illogical to people who engage in black/white thinking which is often the case with conservatives, especially conservative men.

QuoteA straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw man argument" is to create a position that is easy to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent. Often, the straw man is set up to deliberately overstate the opponent's position.[1] A straw man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it is in fact a misleading fallacy, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted.[2]

Its name is derived from the practice of using straw men in combat training. In such training, a scarecrow is made in the image of the enemy with the single intent of attacking it.[3] It is occasionally called a straw dog fallacy, scarecrow argument, or wooden dummy argument.

---wikepedia
  •  

Susan

Susan Larson
Founder
Susan's Place Transgender Resources

Help support this website and our community by Donating or Subscribing!
  •