So who here thinks The Silence of the Lambs is transphobic and who thinks it isn't?
Some people make the argument that because of Hannibal Lecter's offhand mention of Buffalo Bill not really being a transsexual, that that immediately makes the film immune from accusations of transphobia... I tend to disagree. For starters, the remark is so offhand as to be considered negligible. I doubt very many people who have seen the film even remember them saying it. Second, regardless of whether or not that line is taken into account, the film overall does not look to lightly on cross-gender behavior in regards to men. Bill and and Jodie Foster's character are inverts of each other: Foster is a woman entering into a "man's world", where Bill is a man entering into a "woman's world". Yet Foster's endeavors are treated as admirable while Bill's are treated as predatory. And this is not to say that one cannot have an antagonist who is also a crossdresser or homosexual or transgender or what have you, but Bill comes from a long line of other films with notably effeminate villains and killers (i.e. Psycho, Sleepaway Camp, Pocahontas, Dressed to Kill, Aladdin, The Little Mermaid [Ursula was modeled after a drag queen], Ace Ventura, etc.). His character is a trope. He is a cardboard stand-in and lacks any real depth or personality. What do we actually know about Bill? We know what Hannibal thinks he knows, and we know that Bill kills women and wears their skin... but what else? The movie would be less offensive if they did not have the gender-defying Bill as the antagonist to the equally gender-defying Foster, and also if they did more for Bill's character than just showing off how creepy he is.
No, Bill is not a transsexual, but to many he represents what a transsexual is in their minds and this is why the film is problematic.
There's my contribution. I'd love to hear what you all think!