I haven't really had much interest in the Epstein files, if that is what is being discussed. However, I think that it has become one of the biggest and most pointless witch hunts in history. Just proving that someone met or even socialised with a criminal is not proving that they knew of or approved of what was going on but it is already destroying careers.
Whenever authorities ask for witnesses to come forward, witnesses come forward. In an age without newspapers, mass media, social media or telephones or even regular mail, and even in small and relatively remote communities, there was no shortage of witnesses who were prepared to accuse their neighbours of being in league with Satan and performing evil miracles that defied the laws of nature. False witnesses can come forward for many reasons, including malice, money and even mental illness.
As has been pointed out, some of the accusations on social media seem about as likely as those made in, e.g., 17th C Salem but even the more plausible accusations are not necessarily true. In an age of mass media, I believe that wrongful convictions could occur because the Prosecution highlights hundreds of plausible accusations without a jury getting to consider the thousands of impossible accusations.
It may be because I haven't been paying enough attention but I am not even aware of any proven offence in the Epstein case that is illegal in Britain, which has a lower age of consent than the USA.