Hi Everyone An interesting question, "What do you make of this?" and I have read the replies in regards to this issue and they do matter, as each of you highlighted different aspects of what may have been going on.
Danielle and Paulie, I agree it is entirely possible that the doctor suspects more than he lets on and that his questions may have been an attempt to open the subject indirectly. Victoria, I also agree that being asked once is reasonable and that being asked repeatedly with suggested options does change the dynamic and raises legitimate questions about boundaries and of course Allie's point of not reading too much into what was said. I know as I have been in several instances, not that I can remember anything specific, where something was said and I was wondering if they knew.
However, I never say anything and if they knew they knew and if they did not then they did not, as there is nothing that I can do either way. It reinforces for me that comments and questions can be ambiguous or coincidental, but once confidence or visibility changes, meaning is quickly assigned by others and the consequences can extend well beyond the original interaction, which is why I am careful about what I disclose and when.
Taking all of that into account, I want to clarify where I am coming from and how I have handled similar situations to those Petunia has described, as my response is based on long standing practice rather than uncertainty or fear.
By nature I do not disclose my past or my medical history unless there is a clear and compelling reason to do so. That has been consistent throughout my life. When I first changed my life around, a small number of doctors necessarily knew about my condition at that time. Outside of that initial period, disclosure has been extremely limited and deliberate.
Even during colon surgery I did not disclose, as it was not relevant to the procedure. Separately, I have undergone investigations such as MRIs, ultrasounds and X rays without disclosure and without issue. More recently, when I was admitted to hospital regarding my chest, I was asked whether I had ever had any major surgeries. I answered no. The reason was simple. The admission related to my chest, not my private anatomy and my privacy in that regard remains absolute.
There are only four doctors I have told explicitly in the past three years and that was done for very specific reasons. In those cases it was made clear that this information was to be kept absolutely private and not recorded on national systems. I do not have a My Health Record and I have not joined MyMedicare for that reason.
In other situations, only a handful of doctors have ever known about my condition and that was during the initial period when I changed my life around. Outside of that, I rely on prepared responses when questions arise. On the rare occasions I have been questioned about hormone dosage, both times by pharmacies, my response has been consistent. My medical condition requires hormone replacement and my doctor is aware of my condition. That has always been sufficient.
I am also fully aware that there are certain medical conditions and treatments that differ between male and female biology and I take that into account when assessing risk and medical relevance. Where disclosure is medically necessary, that is a separate decision. Where it is not, privacy remains paramount.
This approach has worked well for me for decades. It is not avoidance. It is risk management based on lived experience.
So when you ask, "what do you make of this?" and after considering all of the perspectives, my conclusion is that the doctor's questions may well have come from awareness or trying to support you in some indirect manner. In Australia (I'm an Aussie) and others here have mentioned that Patient confidentiality in Australia is legally mandated and is considered a fundamental duty for healthcare professionals. It is protected under the Privacy Act 1988 and various state laws, ensuring that personal health information is kept private unless specific legal exceptions apply. That does not automatically create an obligation for you to disclose. For me, maintaining control over what is shared has always been essential to me and my privacy and there is no reason that justifies changing that approach.
I appreciate everyone taking the time to respond. Hearing how others interpret the same situation has been genuinely useful in clarifying my own thinking.
Best Wishes AlwaysSarah BGlobal Moderator@Northern Star Girl @Petunia @Allie Jayne @Paulie @VictoriasSecret