Quote from: Zoey Addisyn on Today at 01:57:26 PMMy surgeon always recommends the penile inversion technique as a first surgery. The primary reason is that if there is a complication that requires a massive revision then the other two options (PPT and Colon) are still available to the surgeon. It is impossible to perform a penile inversion vaginoplasty once the other surgery techniques have been used and/or failed. I am very happy with my penile inversion vaginoplasty. I was originally interested in the PPT method, but following my consult with Dr McGinn, I was convinced that she was the right surgeon and this was the best method for me. I am very pleased with the aesthetics and function of my vagina. I am at 5 months post op and have had no complications.
Thanks Zoey for your reply. Really pleased that your surgery went well and you're happy with the result. I'm pretty much of the same conclusion, keep it simple and reduce the risks. My surgeon doesn't do penile inversion but scrotal skin graft. However it's a similarly basic procedure that doesn't interfere with too many functional areas like colon and PPV do.
Interesting you note about retaining capacity to revise if something goes wrong and needs revision. That's a good point and option to keep open.
On a side note I'm using my credit card to make payments. This means that if it goes wrong and I need revision, I can use something called section 75. This makes the card company equally as liable to fix the issue as the surgeon. As such if the surgeon doesn't sort it, I can claim the costs for revision from the card company!
Charlotte 😻