I'm sorry, but I don't believe a word of this story.
The purpose, according to the article is the Hiundustan Times is for genetic boys who are born with incomplete external genital development. Though it seems to be trying to say something a little different.
The story in the Mail is of this primitive culture, (which we should never have left, handing power over to a bunch of natives!! Preposterus, eh what!!), forcing some operation on baby girls, to make them into baby boys. And worse, that wanting a boy is a fettish! (You see, these primitives? Eh What!! Bad show I'd say!!).
Now many of us will have a problem with operations being performed on children while still babies. But however strongly we may feel about, it's hardly what is being reported in the Mail, or implied in the Hindustan Times.
But 200 to 300!! If they are having 200 to 300 babies born in that area, with genital deformations, then they probably have a much more serious, environmental problem.
But I don't believe a word of it.
Adition.
Just to emphasise how utterly silly the Daily Mail is, here's a report, headlined: 'Criminals' aged just 3: Children responsible for hidden crimewave, including rape and vandalism... and there's nothing police can do'
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2008403/Criminals-aged-just-3-Children-responsible-hidden-crimewave-including-rape-vandalism--theres-police-do.html#ixzz1QVTl6YqZChildren of 3, raping??