Quote from: Raige on August 03, 2011, 03:38:15 PM
They could observe without expectations rather than make assumptions or categorizations.
To do that is to become constantly confused, lost and frightened of the world. Do you observe every individual person freshly or do you see the guy in the suit and think "he'll grab a seat on the train and put his briefcase on the other one"? I'm sure you don't imagine every old lady (for example) to be a potential mugger, millionaire philanthropist or what-have-ye.
The fact remains that it's a normal and healthy human function to assume and categorise, to use that information to make predictions - I know that the red man is shining - so I should not cross the road because I'll get run over. You don't have to learn that at every individual crossing you come to.
As it is impossible not to assume and categorise, what is really wanted is that people are ready and free to change and modify our categorisations - and to be honest people will only do that if they get to know you (until they become your friend and then you are just 'Raige' and so a category all of your own) but to expect strangers to put all this mental investment in you when they may never see you again - is unfair and unlikely.
Now, I'd also like it if gender was not one of the first categorisations that people make, or at the very least that there was enough awareness of the bendiness of those categorisations, that it's not so clean cut as either/or but while it is commonly supposed to be as easy as either/or, it'll be one of the first assumptions and generalisations made. Ever played Guess Who? The smart player always asks the gender first - it's easy, and people will always do what is easy.