It generally seems to be taken as a given that physical gender is determined by the shape of one of the 46th chromazones.
I just find this too neat, too straightforward. If I've learn one thing about humans, it's that nothing is simple and neat.
Sorry if this point is not strictly relevant to the topic, which frankly is outside any area of expertise anyway. But given the seemingly devastating genetic differences that apparently have emerged in this women, that she is a human at all suggests that our simplistic comprehension of genetics is misplaced.