Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

The Days of Calling Women Like Jenna Talackova “Transgendered” Are Numbered

Started by Natasha, May 25, 2012, 11:55:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natasha

The Days of Calling Women Like Jenna Talackova "Transgendered" Are Numbered

http://blogs.montrealgazette.com/2012/05/16/the-days-of-calling-women-like-jenna-talackova-transgendered-are-numbered/
5/16/12
Jillian Page

A reader's comment today reminded me of just how much the whole Jenna Talackova affair is making some women like her (and me) grimace every time they see her called "a transgender woman." We've talked about this before: the word "transgender" is not necessary, in fact, it is considered to be discriminatory by many people. But the media are having a field day with the Jenna Talackova story, and as several senior editors have told me, the "transgender" angle is the hook — they would not be reporting this story if Jenna had been "a natural-born woman," whatever that means.
  •  

Cindy

I have been writing to newspapers asking why they use that adjective for some woman and not all. I have asked why don't they use 'real' as an adjective for  woman who were born in their correct sexual structure.

I have not had a single reply.

BTW I am deliberately using the 'real' adjective to be provocative to the newspaper, not to be insulting to woman.

Cindy
  •