Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

The Days of Calling Women Like Jenna Talackova “Transgendered” Are Numbered

Started by Natasha, May 25, 2012, 11:55:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natasha

The Days of Calling Women Like Jenna Talackova "Transgendered" Are Numbered

http://blogs.montrealgazette.com/2012/05/16/the-days-of-calling-women-like-jenna-talackova-transgendered-are-numbered/
5/16/12
Jillian Page

A reader's comment today reminded me of just how much the whole Jenna Talackova affair is making some women like her (and me) grimace every time they see her called "a transgender woman." We've talked about this before: the word "transgender" is not necessary, in fact, it is considered to be discriminatory by many people. But the media are having a field day with the Jenna Talackova story, and as several senior editors have told me, the "transgender" angle is the hook — they would not be reporting this story if Jenna had been "a natural-born woman," whatever that means.
  •  

Cindy

I have been writing to newspapers asking why they use that adjective for some woman and not all. I have asked why don't they use 'real' as an adjective for  woman who were born in their correct sexual structure.

I have not had a single reply.

BTW I am deliberately using the 'real' adjective to be provocative to the newspaper, not to be insulting to woman.

Cindy
  •