Susan's Place Logo

News:

Please be sure to review The Site terms of service, and rules to live by

Main Menu

Marijuana May Fight Lung Tumors

Started by togetherwecan, April 18, 2007, 07:25:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

togetherwecan

(WebMD) Cannabis may be bad for the lungs, but the active ingredient in marijuana may help combat lung cancer, new research suggests.

In lab and mouse studies, the compound, known as THC, cut lung tumor growth in half and helped prevent the cancer from spreading, says Anju Preet, PhD, a Harvard University researcher in Boston who tested the chemical.

While a lot more work needs to be done, the results suggest THC has therapeutic potential, she tells WebMD.

Moreover, other early research suggests the cannabis compound could help fight brain, prostate, and skin cancers as well, Preet says.

The findings were presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research.

The finding builds on the recent discovery of the body's own cannabinoid system, Preet says. Known as endocannabinoids, the natural cannabinoids stimulate appetite and control pain and inflammation.

THC seeks out, attaches to, and activates two specific endocannabinoids that are present in high amounts on lung cancer cells, Preet says. This revs up their natural anti-inflammatory properties. Inflammation can promote the growth and spread of cancer.

In the new study, the researchers first demonstrated that THC inhibited the growth and spread of .......
http://www.rawstory.com/showarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbsnews.com%2Fstories%2F2007%2F04%2F17%2Fhealth%2Fwebmd%2Fmain2696726.shtml
  •  

Yvonne

That's why there aren't any incidents of lung cancer among the Dutch or the hippies.   >:D
  •  

Dennis

Woohoo, I'll start smoking pot when the ciggies catch up to me.

And I agree, it should not be illegal and the original reason in the states is racism. Canada is just a copycat as far as making it illegal. Ridiculous. If it'd been in common use as long as alcohol, it might have had a prohibition period, but would not be illegal now, I'd wager.

It's not my thing, but I see no reason, in my practice of criminal law and family law why it should be illegal. Alcohol has far worse effects in both those areas (obviously outside the offence of simple possession).

Dennis
  •  

Brooke_NY

Quote from: Dennis on April 19, 2007, 12:54:32 AM
It's not my thing, but I see no reason, in my practice of criminal law and family law why it should be illegal. Alcohol has far worse effects in both those areas (obviously outside the offence of simple possession).

Dennis

Ah nice. It's good to see reason.

Drug use and addiction is a HEALTH issue. Not a criminal one (outside the offense of simple possession). When one violates another human being and/or thier property we should arrest them for those crimes.

But I don't think possession of drugs or use should be a crime.

Neither do a growing number of cops.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition - http://www.leap.cc

It's sad that we spend $69 billion a year in an inate effort to arrest a health issue away. You can not arrest a health issue away.
  •