Just wondering. This is the most common method, but there is a good deal of people, specially in the U.S., that were circumcised prior to this, so I'm guessing that when the surgeons work with this method, they are usually prepared to dead with a lack of foreskin.
My doubt is that in the next months I will be called for an scheduled circumcision, possibly removing everything. Foreskin, frenulum... It's a really bad case of constricting phimosis, so I seriously doubt the skin would be worthy of being used in the process (so small compared to the rest that it would not be penetrable). The real issue is that it is small to the point of not allowing standard masturbation or sex without making it incredibly painful and risking skin tearing and bleeding, and I wanted to keep the monster as exercised as possible if I were to take the final step.
Now I am split, between keeping it for "maybe SRS", and removing it for health and safety reasons (It can take years until I choose SRS, and it will mean a decreased quality of life).
Any opinions or experiences? And yes, I know that Suporn can do it without using the penis, not necessary to bring him here.