I don't know where to start with this thread.
Where there are guns, there is more homicide:
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/To be clear though, I'm not necessarily pro banning guns. I also feel that altering gun control laws- whether they be greater or more lax restrictions- won't [WHOA what a typo that was] prevent disasters such as Newtown, et al. A psychopath is a psychopath, and they'll acquire their assault weaponry however necessary. What I'm not comfortable with, though, is the thought that a totally-armed public is a safe public. Most of us (hopefully/thankfully) are never in the situation where we need to pull a weapon for self defense. Do we really think that, in our adrenaline rush, we're capable of neutralizing the point of danger? Personally, if I were held at gunpoint, no...I wouldn't want a gun to level the playing field. Introducing another gun will only add to the tension, and increase the chance of deadlier crossfire.
Quote from: cynthialee on January 12, 2013, 01:20:59 PM
So when someone starts shooting people who do we call? Guys with guns.
Guys with guns, better trained to control their emotions through simulations (as Annah explained), who are taught to use their weapons as a last resort.