Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

The Pathologization of Trans* Identity

Started by Shana A, March 06, 2013, 12:29:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

The Pathologization of Trans* Identity

Filed By Drew Cordes | March 05, 2013 11:00 AM

http://www.bilerico.com/2013/03/the_pathologization_of_trans_identity.php

Devoted Bilerico readers might remember a conversational post from Winter Tashlin and me about reclaiming words and accompanying issues of identity. While I found the discussion edifying, there is one prickly subject I glossed over in a comment that has been hounding me ever since. When discussing the reasons why trans* folks are privy to certain terminology while cis people are not, I said, "For trans people, it's about the body. Some of us are non-op, yes, but dysphoria regarding the body is always there."

Now, I can tell you definitively, because I'm the one who said it, this statement is complete bulls--. This reasoning of mine is faulty at best, and downright dangerous at worst.

I have a number of trans*-identified friends and lovers who are non-op and do not desire hormone replacement therapy. The fact that I failed to recognize as valid the existence of people I was already physically and emotionally intimate with shows the sobering extent to which trans* identity has become pathologized by the medical community/industry and the dominant cultural narratives that reinforce the diagnosis.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •  

DriftingCrow

ਮਨਿ ਜੀਤੈ ਜਗੁ ਜੀਤੁ
  •