Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Abandoning the DSM (warning: possible triggers on this topic)

Started by insideontheoutside, May 04, 2013, 02:44:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

insideontheoutside

I recently came across this article http://mindhacks.com/2013/05/03/national-institute-of-mental-health-abandoning-the-dsm/ about the National Institute of Metal Health announcing, just 2 weeks before the release of the DSM-V, that they're going to be, "re-orienting it's research away from DSM categories." Earlier that same day, I also found another article http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/05/the-real-problems-with-psychiatry/275371/ that discusses problems with psychiatric diagnosis based on the DSM.

Even though the second one in particular was long, I read the whole thing, and I actually agree with a large portion of it. I found the first article interesting as well.

I know it's been a topic on the boards before of how the DSM relates to trans issues. I know it's also been a topic on the boards before of how many trans people have been diagnosed with additional disorders. My issue with the field of psychiatry pretty much always has been with the diagnosis – and the inconsistency between therapists and psychiatrists themselves. Witness how many folks just on this board talk about experiences with their particular therapist or psychiatrist and how much those experiences vary. One person may be diagnosed within a short amount of time and get their letter for HRT, while another may spend a year or more in therapy before that happens.

Additionally, I appreciated that the second article link addresses the negative effect of being diagnosed with a mental disorder. For instance, a therapist giving me the GID diagnosis when I was a teenager basically ruined years of my life. What that did in my teenage mind was solidify that I was completely screwed up and that no one actually believed that I was really male (that it was just this mental disorder I had). So because of personal experience, I'm not a fan of the field in general, but that's my opinion. That article also pointed out some positive things about diagnosis (ex. Asperger's syndrome). So it's not like I believe that all of psychology should be thrown under the bus, but I'm all for throwing out the DSM and approaching things differently.

I'm not on HRT and not transitioning, but I am curious about how trans issues are going to be approached in a therapeutic capacity if there's a shift away from the DSM.  I'm wondering if people like me (definitely trans, but have found my own way of dealing with it) would be treated differently? Previously, my treatment (besides the original GID diagnosis) by therapists has been along the lines of, "well if you don't want to transition, maybe you're not trans at all and you really do have a mental disorder." So again, my viewpoint has been colored by past experience, but nevertheless, I'm interested in what will happen with the treatment of other trans people. I'm also interested to see if there will be less diagnosis will happen across the board or what.

Feel free to discuss.
"Let's conspire to ignite all the souls that would die just to feel alive."
  •  

Adam (birkin)

i'm not entirely sure. I do think that the DSM is too restrictive, say for example, in your situation it clearly is. But I have never seen the diagnosis as a mental disorder, and neither have the psychiatrists I have dealt with. He actually made a point of saying "this is classified as a mental disorder but I don't see it as one, at all. but having the diagnosis allows us to acknowledge that this is a medical condition that requires medical treatment." Since there's no definitive explanation (biologically) for why we are the way we are at this time.

So I am concerned that if there is no diagnosis, we could lose access to medical/insurance coverage (those who have it).
  •  

Cassandra Hyacinth

The DSM is busted in multiple ways to be honest, not just how it regards trans people. For example [TW: discussion of ED]The DSM states that you can't be diagnosed with anorexia unless you're less than 85% of your 'expected' weight, even if you exhibit every other function of the disorder[END TW]

So really, I see a shift away from the DSM as being wholly a good thing.
My Skype name is twisted_strings.

If you need someone to talk to, and would like to add me as a contact, send me a contact request on Skype, plus a PM on here telling me your Skype name.  :)
  •