Quote from: kyh on May 27, 2013, 10:27:55 AM
That comes down to a matter of opinion. We shouldn't be so quick to judge others just because of some marks they put on their body; they're still the same person they were prior to doing so and deserve the same respect.
Meh, not entire sure you're right. Of course they're the same person - they're just telling everybody what kind of person that is.
Is there a particular tattoo that
must be located on a face? Not really. The location itself is a broader statement, and that statement is often very clear. In fact, I can't think of any other statement that a facial tattoo is making. (And I'm not talking about a couple of little stars under someone's eyes here - I'm talking about the forehead tattoos, whole neck tattoos, cheeks, scalp tattoos on a shaven head etc.) A facial tattoo is a specific type of tattoo - it's akin to ramming your opinion down someone's throat every time they look at you. It's intrusive. You can't communicate with someone with a facial tattoo without seeing that tattoo and what it represents, both explicitly and implicitly. It goes far beyond mere artwork.
I think they deserve the same respect as anyone else (depending on the associations of the tattoo). Everybody I meet, no matter what, gets the same respect. Whether they get that respect from society as a whole is a different story, because there's plenty of people out there who hold far more conservative attitudes towards these things. I would strongly disagree with any statement that facial tattoos are fine, acceptable, and are just a harmless form of expression that we should all just deal with and ignore. Those types of tattoos often come with actual or implied membership in certain distasteful groups or belief systems (gangs, fringe political movements allied to hate, etc.)
And "don't give a f**k" is fine attitude to have. I have no problems with that, just as long as it's accompanied by a "and I will accept the consequences, including lack of employment, lack of respect from many people, and voluntarily taking an act that is entirely unnecessary but which comes with great downsides" attitude too.
There's far easier ways to express yourself - including more discretely placed tattoos - than forcing others to see your "artwork" every time they look at your face. Nobody needs to fight that battle, and there are dozens of other worthy causes for which you can put your neck on the line if you want to take on society and make a change. Acceptance of facial tattoos is rather low on my list of important issues right now.
I don't know. Google "face tattoo" and tell me how many are good decisions that say positive things about the person. By getting the ink on your face, you're associating with some rather poor company. And while we can't judge a book by its cover, I doubt that anyone would claim that when they Google "face tattoo" that it could really be thousands of pictures of doctors and judges and teachers and activists and charity workers and PTA presidents and police officers and soldiers and librarians and pilots and waiters and professors and accountants and scientists and engineers and social workers and so forth.
It's okay to, er, draw
some lines in society (excuse the wording.) Smoking is bad. Taking heroin is bad. Urinating on the playset in the park is bad. Screaming "f**k off" to old ladies in the street is bad. Tattoos on the face are at least in the same ballpark. Society doesn't accept certain things,
and that's okay! It would be a miserable society if there were no lines! In fact, we have countless laws and regulations and rules and standards to cover just about everything, both written and unwritten, because they are what make society livable, and because that's what people want (even us people here on this site).
We just need to make sure our lines our not drawn to discriminate against or prohibit things that can't be helped (e.g. homosexuality, transgender issues, race, color, ethnicity, national origin, age, gender, disability, health etc.) Nobody is forced to put a tattoo on their face, and by doing so, they willingly assume the consequences of the clear societal dislike for such things.
I could be wrong. But at the very least, anyone claiming that facial tattoos are acceptable needs to put
(* but this is a niche opinion) after their statement.