I was aware of the issue being raised but had no knowledge of it apart from that Beth.
For a number of reasons. I'm actually quite worried about this.
Firstly, Abbot has a history of resentful and confrontation politics. Feminism and other divisive issues are often her beef.
I'm very concerned about her claim that, somehow, emphasising the role of fathers in families should be encouraged.
Many families don't have fathers.
A father who is abusive, mean or just weak isn't likely to get much better.
But more, I suggest the issue is the emphasis our societies place upon Alpha. Especially alpha male, but alpha female as well. The emphasis essentially says that achieving anything less than Alpha is failure. Seeking or desiring anything less than Alpha is weak.
Alpha will, by definition, always be a tiny minority. It is achieved through personality, intelligence and character. Too often we see those clearly unsuited for alpha, compensating with aggression, threats, deceit, nastiness and violence.
I suggest it's perfectly masculine to be gay. It's perfectly masculine to be feminine. It's perfectly masculine to be sensitive, caring and kind.
Be really interested to hear other perspectives on this.