According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006
Started by katia, June 06, 2007, 03:38:44 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Cindi Jones on June 06, 2007, 04:21:15 PMThere is nothing. You are a dream.Cindi
Quote from: Katia on May 28, 2007, 11:41:39 PMi'm mad
Quote from: Cindi Jones on May 29, 2007, 12:19:24 AMQuote from: Katia on May 28, 2007, 11:57:46 PMQuote from: Cindi Jones on May 28, 2007, 11:49:11 PMYeah Katia, I'd be mad too.... judging from your avatar, you're all cracked up!Cindii meant. mentally insaneKatia... so did I!Cindi
Quote from: Katia on May 28, 2007, 11:57:46 PMQuote from: Cindi Jones on May 28, 2007, 11:49:11 PMYeah Katia, I'd be mad too.... judging from your avatar, you're all cracked up!Cindii meant. mentally insane
Quote from: Cindi Jones on May 28, 2007, 11:49:11 PMYeah Katia, I'd be mad too.... judging from your avatar, you're all cracked up!Cindi
Quote from: Pica Pica on June 06, 2007, 06:17:33 PMthe infinite nature of the universe allowed there to be enough combinations for something to happen.
Quote from: Katia on June 06, 2007, 03:38:44 PMWhy is there something rather than nothing at all?enlighten me! >
Quote from: Cindi Jones on June 06, 2007, 04:21:15 PMThere is nothing. You are a dream.
Quote from: Fiona on June 15, 2007, 07:31:28 AM...by assuming "nothing" exists you define the number 1 to be the set whose only member is that "nothing" and, hey presto!, you've created "something" out of "nothing".
Quote from: None of the Above on June 15, 2007, 01:38:43 PMSo, in other words, {something} and {nothing} have a kind of equivalence, no?
QuoteWhy is there something rather than nothing at all?
Quote from: None of the Above on June 15, 2007, 01:38:43 PMQuote from: Fiona on June 15, 2007, 07:31:28 AM...by assuming "nothing" exists you define the number 1 to be the set whose only member is that "nothing" and, hey presto!, you've created "something" out of "nothing".So, in other words, {something} and {nothing} have a kind of equivalence, no?none/o.t.a.
Quote from: Fiona on June 15, 2007, 03:25:27 PMQuote from: None of the Above on June 15, 2007, 01:38:43 PMQuote from: Fiona on June 15, 2007, 07:31:28 AM...by assuming "nothing" exists you define the number 1 to be the set whose only member is that "nothing" and, hey presto!, you've created "something" out of "nothing".So, in other words, {something} and {nothing} have a kind of equivalence, no?none/o.t.a.More like nothing is something, therefore something exists.