Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Christian Privilege

Started by LearnedHand, October 21, 2013, 09:18:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DriftingCrow

Just things that I've noticed. . . Applies mainly to those in Western countries, and of course there are always some exceptions.

1) Most people at least know the basics of your religion.

2) Whenever a Christian does a bad act, you don't need to put a pastor/priest on the news to defend your religion and members.

3) Overall, your religion is associated with peace and love. Forced conversions and killings done in the past are largely forgotten and ignored.

4) With the exception of very rural areas, there are many churches within a reasonable distance from your home to choose from.

5) While wearing your Sunday best, people don't assume that you're a foreigner.

6) People don't look at you with suspicion, they don't blatantly yell "terrorist!" at you, and follow you around. Overall, you don't need to leave the house and wonder if this is the day that someone is going to beat you up or kill you because of your religion.

7) People of your religion hold a majority of political seats and other positions of power.

8) Overall, you don't need to worry if a landlord charged you higher rent because of your religion.

9) Christian women aren't looked down upon for being "submissive" and Christian men aren't assumed to hate or disrespect women.

10) For the most part, if you aren't hired somewhere, you don't worry if it was because of your religion.

11) You don't feel as religiously isolated because it's easy to find other Christians nearby.

12) When you tell people you are Christian, they don't ask "why??" and then ask you about radical and hate groups. When you convert from one denomination to the other, people don't think you're "just trying to be different" or that you're going through a phase.

13) Food service workers don't question your order by saying "you know there's bacon in that?" or "I thought you guys didn't drink alcohol".

14) You're not considered a threat to the American/British/Norwegian/etc. way of life.

15) People don't burn crosses in your yard, or deface your business or house of worship by painting swastikas and other hateful and threatening messages on the walls because of your religion. People don't boycott the construction of a new church because they hate your religion. People don't walk into your house of worship and shoot worshippers because they think you're a threat.

16) You don't need to wonder if a new member of the congregation is a FBI or NYPD undercover agent. You don't feel like you're under surveillance by the government.

---------
Edited to add link and to say, this wasn't intended to offend anyone, please see my explanation below.
ਮਨਿ ਜੀਤੈ ਜਗੁ ਜੀਤੁ
  •  

Del

Not all who call themselves Christian are Christians.
There are some of us that are just as hated and disrespected.
  •  

ZoeM

Increasingly, I've found, this is not the case. I do get asked "Why?" I do get asked about "hate groups" and such. I often have no idea someone's a Christian because nobody wants to admit it. And increasingly, I am considered a threat to the American way of life. And saying it's because of my politics is no excuse. In America, of all places, the news media, entertainment media, and education system should not be overtly hostile to fully half the nation. The fact that they are is the antithesis of "Christian privilege."
Don't lose who you are along the path to who you want to be.








  •  

Sarah Louise

I don't believe there is any "Christian Privilege", that is a myth perpetuated by those who disagree with the religion.
Nameless here for evermore!;  Merely this, and nothing more;
Tis the wind and nothing more!;  Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore!!"
  •  

Heather

I keep hearing this word privilege thrown around but I'm not really buying it everybody has it tough in this world. Sure some people will discriminate against people different than them but you'll find that anywhere and in any belief. This grass is greener on the other side mentality is not healthy and very unproductive.  ;)
  •  

DriftingCrow

Why I made this post wasn't to make people feel bad. It was in response to some recent statements, and many statements and attitudes I've seen written on this board. To me, it seemed like statements that suggest a hatred and intolerance of other religious groups wasn't be taken seriously. The statements were being made by people who say they're Christian (also some by people who say they're atheist).

Those who I perceived to be attacking other groups and blaming the other groups for their problems I believed seemed blind to some of the benefits they have from being in a majority religion, especially one where it is easy to not be noticed in the crowd. As I stated in the OP, there are exceptions, and I meant privileges compared to minority religions, rather then privileges in general in society. I am aware that our country is moving toward being more atheist/agnostic, and the churches like the WBC make Christians look bad.

Saying other religions are "taking over" and having bad, stereotypical, and discriminatory things to say about people in these other religions isn't very productive though, and some statements I've seen really shows a need of some to try going to an Interfaith dialogue. 

Like some people will tell you, I don't hate Christians. I have Christian friends, I have a Christian Bible, and I've defended Christians both here on Susan's and IRL. Despite that, I do think every once in awhile we need to at least think about some things we have that are good (like. . . not having people yell terrorist at you because most Christian women don't believe they need to wear a headscarf). I had to read the "Invisible Knapsack: White Privilege" essay years ago, and that was a great read, and as a pale-skinned person, I think of that list all the time. While you may not agree with my list, those are just some things that I've noticed I had more when I was identifying as Christian and that I don't quite have now. I don't cover my head every day, so I have the contrast of days where I am just seen as another white female in the crowd, and then on days when I am going to temple, and I put a scarf on and maybe stop quickly at a store on the way to or fro and seeing how some people treat me. There are some benefits to being in a headscarf, and other really bad things.

I am mainly just sick of being on here and hearing these statements from people who claim they're Christians that put down other religious groups. There should be more tolerance and empathy.

If you think Christianity is under threat, it's been easy to blame "the boogeyman" which is Islam and other visible religious minority. Why? Because you can see them. Walking down the street, you see a woman with a scarf or a dark skinned man with a beard and skull-cap, you can easily assume s/he is a Muslim. The media often paints them in a bad light, they're misunderstood, there's sometimes language barriers, culture barriers, etc. The media is confused about what Sharia law is, and confusion and ignorance makes things seem more threatening.

However, it isn't these religious groups that are threatening Christianity in the Western world. It's unfair to blame these other groups and say things which come across as being insensitive and hurtful to these people. The real threat isn't just to Christianity, it's to religious people of all types. Anyone seen the proposed law from Quebec? They want to ban large crosses, skull caps, hijab, niqab, turbans, and yarmulkes from public workers.  This effects people of ALL religions.

Now, I could write a Sikh privilege list, or Pagan privilege list too. (I was raised Christian, it didn't connect with me. I was Pagan for awhile, and then I realized that I was actually Sikh and didn't know it). All religions have their benefits and con in society.

Those were my observations, and your feedback is always appreciated. :)

I do though think it would be a nice exercise to see what it's like being a visible religious minority (we all know what it's like to be visible as trans). For anyone willing to play along, it would be interesting to see those who live as female in their everyday life to put on a headscarf, long sleeves and pants, and go out to the store, the movies, whatever and write about if you think you were treated differently. Those who live as men, put on a skull cap or tie a turban and try to grow your beard and see if you're treated differently.

Tolerance and empathy can come with walking a mile in each other's shoes. I feel like I've been on both sides of this. Being assumed to be a Muslim even though I am not, and having been called a terrorist and traitor is perspective-changing.

Again, I don't hate Christians or Christianity. Not everyone here or Christians in general are who I am talking about.

(wow, I think this is my longest post ever)
ਮਨਿ ਜੀਤੈ ਜਗੁ ਜੀਤੁ
  •  

Del

Learnedhand,
I would hope that my posts do not fall into a category as you say as I do not attempt to offend people. But it can happen being crude of speech and all.

When I was in Israel I wore a skull cap to go into the Holocaust Museum. I did this to honor their faith and their beliefs. I do not regret this as it is just a courtesy and even though the word of God says a man should not pray with his head covered I feel too many Pentecostal people go overboard with it. The ones I used to worship with who were rather works-oriented.

You would have thought I was the world's worse blasphemer when I told them. Since I do not believe in lying I had to tell them the truth when asked. Still, I am surprised they didn't call me Judas or something.

I ended up leaving that church. the reasons go way farther and not of importance in this topic. Still however, I do know how some are treated when they do that which is really innocent and gives honor to another faith.

At any rate, I hope you don't feel I am doing what you say of some. My references to Islam in a negative connotation are the extremists who I personally do not feel are true Muslims. Just like the abortion bombing people and such aren't true Christians.

May God bless.
  •  

DriftingCrow

Del, I don't hold anything you or others have said against you. I believe in forgiveness, though some things I felt the need to say because some aren't always aware of the things they say or do. I make mistakes all the time, I offend people, and when I do, I'd want someone to tell me so I don't do it again.
ਮਨਿ ਜੀਤੈ ਜਗੁ ਜੀਤੁ
  •  

Chaos

I do not believe in *privilege* in any sense of the word and most of all in Christianity.Just like the human race,orientation,culture or anything else that has a living,breathing person with a brain-there will ALWAYS be one that does wrong by others.There is simply human beings that have either been taught or just feel,that many deserve such negative actions against them.I myself *even with current mental state,tho this i cant control* do not have the heart to act this way towards anyone,regardless of anything.Its true that many will do many bad things to another,even some horrible things and i believe that calling it privilege/justice for the hate they receive from a mindless,hateful bigot/or whatever excuse they give,is purely on the person dishing it out.I have seen alot of support in many places and these actions speak louder then the negative *to me anyway* and many who are weak are easy to be crushed under such negative things.Even my own mind became crushed but due to my own doing,allowing others the ability to even enter it.I believe that hate is hate in any form and even though i do not agree with other religions or have different views,i still believe what my religion says and it says to love ALL and thats exactly what i do.Of course as long as they respect me and my beliefs,not expecting me to convert,then i have no issues what so ever and would treat them the same as any other human being.I do feel that there needs to be a greater respect and understanding for other people and the domination mind set and twisting,to be done away with.
All Thing's Come With A Price...
  •  

JLT1

Responses based on personal experience in the USA and apply only to the USA.  I travel a lot within the US for work.  We have over 200 manufacturing sites that are spread all over and I've been to a bunch of them.  In general, what you say applies to the center and religious left.  The religious right is another story.

1) Most people at least know the basics of your religion.  (Probably true)
2) Whenever a Christian does a bad act, you don't need to put a pastor/priest on the news to defend your religion and members. (Depends on how bad or extreme the act really is....I'm thinking about some of the extremely conservative Christian sects.)
3) Overall, your religion is associated with peace and love. Forced conversions and killings done in the past are largely forgotten and ignored. (Forced conversions and killings seem to be out.  Shunning, forced behavioral changes still go on.)
4) With the exception of very rural areas, there are many churches within a reasonable distance from your home to choose from.  (I'm thinking that a 15 mile radius will get most of the area covered, which is great if one has a car.)
5) While wearing your Sunday best, people don't assume that you're a foreigner. (Depends on where one is at.  There are ethnic neighborhoods and areas in the southern US where clothes acceptable in New England would get someone in trouble.  This does not depend on race.  The US is a BIG country.)
6) People don't look at you with suspicion, they don't blatantly yell "terrorist!" at you, and follow you around. Overall, you don't need to leave the house and wonder if this is the day that someone is going to beat you up or kill you because of your religion. (Again the neighborhood thing or southern thing.  In this instance, it is based more on race than on religion.)
7) People of your religion hold a majority of political seats and other positions of power. (Christianity in the US has to many sects within it for this to apply.  Some conservative parts believe Catholics are worse than any pegan religion.)
8) Overall, you don't need to worry if a landlord charged you higher rent because of your religion. (Generally true.  They just won't rent to someone who is to different.)
9) Christian women aren't looked down upon for being "submissive" and Christian men aren't assumed to hate or disrespect women. (There are some very conservative sects that don't seem to have much, if any respect for women.)
10) For the most part, if you aren't hired somewhere, you don't worry if it was because of your religion. (For the most part.  About the only exception would be a very conservative Christian in a very liberal area. )
11) You don't feel as religiously isolated because it's easy to find other Christians nearby. (I live in a metro area of over 3 million.  I can't find a church I like.  Every neighbor I have is Christian and none go to the same church.  We do not talk about religion.) 

12) When you tell people you are Christian, they don't ask "why??" and then ask you about radical and hate groups. When you convert from one denomination to the other, people don't think you're "just trying to be different" or that you're going through a phase. (In liberal areas, they will ask "why?".  People do not think you are trying to be different.  The response could be anything from "OK" to a total rejection equal to anything a transgender sees.  Seriously, I've know people who have not talked to their families for year.)
13) Food service workers don't question your order by saying "you know there's bacon in that?" or "I thought you guys didn't drink alcohol".  (Conservative Christians often believe that drinking is a sin.)
14) You're not considered a threat to the American/British/Norwegian/etc. way of life. (I can go with this one.)
15) People don't burn crosses in your yard, or deface your business or house of worship by painting swastikas and other hateful and threatening messages on the walls because of your religion. People don't boycott the construction of a new church because they hate your religion. People don't walk into your house of worship and shoot worshippers because they think you're a threat. (They don't shoot worshippers in the US.  The rest?  Not often but it does happen.)
16) You don't need to wonder if a new member of the congregation is a FBI or NYPD undercover agent. You don't feel like you're under surveillance by the government.  (Probably not)
To move forward is to leave behind that which has become dear. It is a call into the wild, into becoming someone currently unknown to us. For most, it is a call too frightening and too challenging to heed. For some, it is a call to be more than we were capable of being, both now and in the future.
  •  

Cindy

If I may make a post here. As many of you know I do not follow any religion or any belief but I will willingly defend the right of anyone to follow their religious beliefs in safety, comfort and with absolute respect for those beliefs.

History is sadly bathed in the the blood of people who have been persecuted for their religious belief and that is wrong, totally and unforgivably wrong.

People of any religion are welcome at my table to share my meal and my conversation without prejudice.

Members of this site in particular suffer discrimination in many forms for many different reasons; let us lead by example to show that tolerance for and love of our fellow humans is the only acceptable way to treat people.
  •  

dalebert

The word "privilege" often rubs me the wrong way because it tends to be abused. It's often a way to be dismissive about other people's real problems. "My problems are way worse than yours so quit complaining. Check your privilege!"

That said, I do feel there is a certain privilege that all religions enjoy that bugs me. I think it's the failure to distinguish between respecting someone's belief and respecting their right to their beliefs. I don't respect most religious beliefs but I absolutely respect someone's right to practice their beliefs peacefully, meaning as long as that practice doesn't infringe on my rights. There's this notion that a belief, if it's religiously-based, is beyond criticism. This leads to the misconception that you somehow have a right to not be offended, but a right to not be offended requires a right to suppress someone else's free speech.

I don't respect a church that rejects gay marriage but I respect their right to not marry a same-sex couple or to acknowledge such a marriage or even to not allow openly gay people in their membership. Courts shouldn't force them. That said, I have a lot to say about that practice. I might even engage in loud but peaceful expressions against such a practice.

On the other hand, a business that has a strict dress code for all its employees can be forced to make an exception for religious reasons. For instance, a business with a no hats policy will likely legally be forced to make an exception for Jewish men or Muslim women. That's ridiculous. As an atheist, I can say I believe all men should wear a certain kind of hat at all times, but that belief is not automatically respected and defended because it's not religiously-based. If I wanted an exception to the policy, I would have to justify my case with a rational argument, i.e. evidence for my reasoning. I might get away with arguing medical reasons if I have a condition that causes me to lose extra heat from my head or something.

The Jew or the Muslim just says "That's my religion" and the debate is over. The courts will force a business to make special exceptions for that person's beliefs. That is absolutely a legal privilege. There are powerful people willing to threaten that business with sanctions if they don't obey and extend special privileges simply on the basis of religion.

DriftingCrow

Quote from: dalebert on October 22, 2013, 10:30:14 AM
On the other hand, a business that has a strict dress code for all its employees can be forced to make an exception for religious reasons. For instance, a business with a no hats policy will likely legally be forced to make an exception for Jewish men or Muslim women. That's ridiculous. As an atheist, I can say I believe all men should wear a certain kind of hat at all times, but that belief is not automatically respected and defended because it's not religiously-based. If I wanted an exception to the policy, I would have to justify my case with a rational argument, i.e. evidence for my reasoning. I might get away with arguing medical reasons if I have a condition that causes me to lose extra heat from my head or something.

The Jew or the Muslim just says "That's my religion" and the debate is over. The courts will force a business to make special exceptions for that person's beliefs. That is absolutely a legal privilege. There are powerful people willing to threaten that business with sanctions if they don't obey and extend special privileges simply on the basis of religion.

Well the First Amendment of the US Constitution gives the freedom to practice your religion, not to wear a hat if you like wearing hats, or a bracelet because it has special meaning to you.

QuoteCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

If wearing a yarmulke is part of someone's religion, it can't be taken away. People wearing religious gear aren't given a free-for-all. You don't see yarmulkes, hijab, turbans, etc. in the military (with the very rare exceptions), because the military in the US wants to keep everyone uniform. You can't wear hijab in factories where it would be dangerous if it's likely the cloth will get caught in equipment. And so on. . .

The exceptions are only given in circumstances where the religious attire wouldn't interfere with stuff like the health, safety, and function of the workplace. I fully support this Amendment, because otherwise people would just say "you can't work here because your [insert article of faith here] will scare customers," etc. This is to protect people of all faiths from religious discrimination.

Religion is considered a "fundamental right" in the US Constitution while people's likes or dislikes don't rise to the same level of protection.

Part of the reason for the OP was to make noticeable some of the things religious minorities who are often seen with dislike in Western countries go through, no to make Christian problems seem less severe. The issue with religious freedom is easy for some secularists and even people of other religions to wish to bend the 1st Amendment right to freedom of worship for various political and social reasons. The thing is though, going down the slippery slope will affect more than the "undesirables". Banning the burqa will lead to banning other things (like in the Quebec article I linked above. I am aware Quebec is not the USA, but there's been similar statements made about wanting to curb the right to this sort of free expression).
ਮਨਿ ਜੀਤੈ ਜਗੁ ਜੀਤੁ
  •  

dalebert

Quote from: LearnedHand on October 22, 2013, 10:48:50 AM
Well the First Amendment of the US Constitution gives the freedom to practice your religion, not to wear a hat if you like wearing hats, or a bracelet because it has special meaning to you.

That's exactly my point. Why are some beliefs given priority over other beliefs for freedom to practice? I'm aware the Constitution gives special status to religious beliefs. I'm arguing for how things ought to be.

QuoteYou don't see yarmulkes, hijab, turbans, etc. in the military (with the very rare exceptions), because the military in the US wants to keep everyone uniform.

That's what they want. And some companies want to keep their employees uniform because while they're on the job, they're representing the company. I'd be appalled at a company that tried to say you couldn't wear a special hat off the job, but if they have a uniform policy that conflicts with your religion, then don't take the job. Don't ask for special treatment that non-religious people don't get. I'm morally opposed to what I would have to do if I joined the military so I won't join the military (again). If someone is morally opposed to dressing a certain way for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, they shouldn't take a job at such a company. No one is going to force them to work there versus somewhere else that doesn't have the same requirements. If the company is smart, they'll exercise such policies with care so as not to turn away good potential employees over something like a religious hat, but how strict their dress policy is should be their decision based on factors they evaluate.

Quote
Religion is considered a "fundamental right" in the US Constitution while people's likes or dislikes don't rise to the same level of protection.

Exactly! And that's my beef. What's the difference? What if I declare one of my beliefs to be a religiously-based belief? When does it qualify as a freedom to practice that would be legally protected and imposed on employers? Why is your religious belief more meaningful legally than my non-religious belief?

QuoteBanning the burqa will lead to banning other things...

Absolutely! The thought of the government telling people how to dress or not to dress, for any reason, terrifies me. That's a step in the direction of tyranny. The thought of two free entities coming to some sort of agreement, forming a freely-entered contract for their mutual benefit like exchanging services for money under certain terms that were made clear in the beginning does not bother me. Why should it? But the thought of a force like a government intervening and imposing certain restrictions on how those two entities freely interact with one another also terrifies me.

Do you understand the difference between me telling you that you will be punished by the government for certain non-violent practices, garmets, etc...
and me offering you a job with certain conditions, made clear up front, with no threat whatsoever to make you take the job or not?

ZoeM

Quote from: dalebert on October 22, 2013, 12:40:39 PM
That's exactly my point. Why are some beliefs given priority over other beliefs for freedom to practice? I'm aware the Constitution gives special status to religious beliefs. I'm arguing for how things ought to be.

That's what they want. And some companies want to keep their employees uniform because while they're on the job, they're representing the company. I'd be appalled at a company that tried to say you couldn't wear a special hat off the job, but if they have a uniform policy that conflicts with your religion, then don't take the job. Don't ask for special treatment that non-religious people don't get. I'm morally opposed to what I would have to do if I joined the military so I won't join the military (again). If someone is morally opposed to dressing a certain way for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, they shouldn't take a job at such a company. No one is going to force them to work there versus somewhere else that doesn't have the same requirements. If the company is smart, they'll exercise such policies with care so as not to turn away good potential employees over something like a religious hat, but how strict their dress policy is should be their decision based on factors they evaluate.

Exactly! And that's my beef. What's the difference? What if I declare one of my beliefs to be a religiously-based belief? When does it qualify as a freedom to practice that would be legally protected and imposed on employers? Why is your religious belief more meaningful legally than my non-religious belief?

Absolutely! The thought of the government telling people how to dress or not to dress, for any reason, terrifies me. That's a step in the direction of tyranny. The thought of two free entities coming to some sort of agreement, forming a freely-entered contract for their mutual benefit like exchanging services for money under certain terms that were made clear in the beginning does not bother me. Why should it? But the thought of a force like a government intervening and imposing certain restrictions on how those two entities freely interact with one another also terrifies me.

Do you understand the difference between me telling you that you will be punished by the government for certain non-violent practices, garmets, etc...
and me offering you a job with certain conditions, made clear up front, with no threat whatsoever to make you take the job or not?

To answer the question about why religion is more important: Because this country, perhaps uniquely out of all the countries on Earth, is based on freedom of - and to practice - religion.
If you want a strictly secular, keep-it-to-yourself humanist nation, there's always Canada. But America is the way it is because some nation, somewhere, has to be. A refuge where all religions can wear any fancy hat they choose, worship what they choose, teach their kids what they choose, and nobody gets to tell them no.
Don't lose who you are along the path to who you want to be.








  •  

Danielle Emmalee

Quote from: ZoeM on October 22, 2013, 12:56:42 PM
To answer the question about why religion is more important: Because this country, perhaps uniquely out of all the countries on Earth, is based on freedom of - and to practice - religion.
If you want a strictly secular, keep-it-to-yourself humanist nation, there's always Canada. But America is the way it is because some nation, somewhere, has to be. A refuge where all religions can wear any fancy hat they choose, worship what they choose, teach their kids what they choose, and nobody gets to tell them no.

Canada?  I'm not sure where you're getting your information but you are badly mistaken. Canada's first fundamental freedom according to the Constitution is freedom of religion.   Yeah, the first fundamental freedom, just like the first amendment of the US Constitution.

Also I don't think that's what dalebert is arguing.  What he is arguing if I understand correctly is that if its okay to use religion to circumvent dress codes then that is giving EXTRA rights to those who have a religion that those who do not practice a religion do not have.

 
Discord, I'm howlin' at the moon
And sleepin' in the middle of a summer afternoon
Discord, whatever did we do
To make you take our world away?

Discord, are we your prey alone,
Or are we just a stepping stone for taking back the throne?
Discord, we won't take it anymore
So take your tyranny away!
  •  

dalebert

Quote from: ZoeM on October 22, 2013, 12:56:42 PM
But America is the way it is because some nation, somewhere, has to be. A refuge where all religions can wear any fancy hat they choose, worship what they choose, teach their kids what they choose, and nobody gets to tell them no.

And we can and should continue to be that. Those are freedoms we should all have regardless of our religious beliefs. No one should have the power to force you to do something you disagree with, wear or not wear what you want. And no one should be able to force you to take a job that has dress codes that conflict with your religious beliefs.

dalebert

Quote from: <3 on October 22, 2013, 01:04:20 PM
What he is arguing if I understand correctly is that if its okay to use religion to circumvent dress codes then that is giving EXTRA rights to those who have a religion that those who do not practice a religion do not have.

Exactly. That's just one example. Treating all your employees the same regardless of their beliefs is not religious discrimination. Making special exceptions for some of your employees depending on their religious beliefs IS religious discrimination and it's not fair to those who don't get the exception due to their (lack of) beliefs.

DriftingCrow

Wouldn't you be concerned that some people wouldn't get jobs at all without protections? Without  some restrictions on the freedom to contract, little to no progress would be made on some fronts. Physically and mentally disabled people hadlittle chances of employment until the ADA came along and other protections and incentives (their work numbers are still poor). New and hated groups would have little opportunities to work if forced to comply in workplaces where their articles of faith make little or no impact on performance.
ਮਨਿ ਜੀਤੈ ਜਗੁ ਜੀਤੁ
  •  

ZoeM

Quote from: dalebert on October 22, 2013, 03:17:20 PM
Exactly. That's just one example. Treating all your employees the same regardless of their beliefs is not religious discrimination. Making special exceptions for some of your employees depending on their religious beliefs IS religious discrimination and it's not fair to those who don't get the exception due to their (lack of) beliefs.
The problem with this is that atheism/secularism/humanism has spent a lot of effort claiming that it's not a religion for other reasons. So making the comparison to religions here is a bit odd - "I should be able to wear whatever hat I want because Jews can, but otherwise I don't have a religion so I'm exempt from that "no teaching/expressing religion in schools" clause."

Specifically, the constitution makes separate provisions for freedom of speech and freedom of religion, and generally institutes different privileges for each. And yes, there's an implicit assumption that religious beliefs are distinct from non-religious beliefs, and get different levels of enforcement.

Don't lose who you are along the path to who you want to be.








  •