Susan's Place Logo

News:

Please be sure to review The Site terms of service, and rules to live by

Main Menu

Christian Privilege

Started by LearnedHand, October 21, 2013, 09:18:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shaina

Quote from: Gina_Z on October 26, 2013, 05:39:07 PM
Generally people associate Moslems with terrorism because a very large percentage of terrorists call themselves Moslem. It's that simple. It has nothing to do with Christian privilege.

Valid point but I'm not so sure I agree. The perpetuation of those stereotypes (Muslims as terrorists) put practitioners of that faith at a disadvantage. Often, Christians don't have to deal with being associated with terrorism though we've had our fair share of terrorists, like The Army of God that bombed those clinics.

Anywho, I could be wrong but isn't the absence of that disadvantage experienced by others the very definition of privilege?
I was a child and she was a child   
    In this kingdom by the sea:   
But we loved with a love that was more than love—
    I and my Annabel Lee
  •  

YBtheOutlaw

it's the 21st century and people from all kinds of cultures and religions live everywhere in the world together. i think it's high time everybody kept their religious beliefs to themselves and started treating the rest of the world as animals of their own species, no more categorization beyond that.
We all are animals of the same species
  •  

Gina_Z

I think it's a good idea to share all ideas, including ideas about religion, science, sex, politics, philosophies, etc.   
  •  

peky

the first thing you need to know about a person you just met regardless of his or her appearance is just how extremes his/her views on anything are.....

Any body who is extreme in his/her:
religious,
environmental,
political,
philosophical,
sexual,
health,
etc

is a person who would not compromise, would not negotiate, who will be willing to die -if required- in order to proselytize his or her "good news" with you...

These self-righteous people are and have been the source of many of humanities genocides and horror...

Let see: crusaders, inquisition, the "Indian fighters" in the conquest of the west, the ethnocidals preachers in south America, the Nazis, the communist, the list goes on and on

  •  

LordKAT

Anyone who is extreme in their regard to human life and fair treatment to all is A OK in my book.
  •  

Gina_Z

I'm all for free speech and against its suppression.
I'm against terrorism and violent acts.
If someone wants to convince me to eat tofu, that's OK.
If they want to force me to eat tofu, that's unacceptable.     
  •  

peky

And in regard with the original premise of the OP is not a fart fetched idea to extend that a Muslim in a Muslim country is going to feel a "Muslim Privilege", and so we can get a Jewish privilege in Israel (or NY..LOL), and Hindu Privilege in India, and so on and so forth
  •  

DriftingCrow

Quote from: peky on November 02, 2013, 08:31:24 PM
And in regard with the original premise of the OP is not a fart fetched idea to extend that a Muslim in a Muslim country is going to feel a "Muslim Privilege", and so we can get a Jewish privilege in Israel (or NY..LOL), and Hindu Privilege in India, and so on and so forth

Of course, like in Saudi Arabia where for the most part non-Muslims aren't even allowed into the country.

Main thing I was trying to say (rehashed again) is that with anyone with privilege (which of course depends on your locale, culture, etc.) it's easy to become blind to the benefits you have in society and blind to the needs of others. I know some white people who were quite upset when reading the White Privilege essay, saying that we're in a "post-racial" society (geez, and this was before Obama came into office!) and that everyone is equal, and that it's not fair that African-Americans have affirmative action. Anyone who pays attention to social issues or isn't white will clearly explain how we're not in a post-racial society, and how white people still have privileges. (This is for Americans here, I can't speak for other countries). Realizing one has white privilege is a good thing, because then you can help be the end to systemic racial discrimination in policy or society.

Sometimes we just have the illusion that we're in a post-racial world because it's no longer politically correct to outright say discriminatory things like it was a few decades ago. Nowadays, most people at least know others of different races (not exactly friends with people of other races), so some of the traditional discriminatory views have been shaken just by merely knowing and interacting with others outside of the same race. (If more people were actually close friends with people of other races, we'd likely have much less discrimination IMO).

It's just now that Muslims are the current people where it's totally acceptable to say hateful, stereotypical things about all over the place without even having to pretend you're not hateful (for someone else's wording *warning, n word in the title*) --- as I've experienced, I hear hateful anti-Muslim, anti-anyreligionthatlooksdifferentthanme speech at work, in media, in movies, and here at Susan's Place. And, surprising to me, is that most of this speech that I've witnessed comes from Christians (there are some Atheists I've seen too). I'd venture to say that many people in the USA who say these things does not really know anyone who's Muslim or Sikh or Hindu or any number of religions that are not Judeo-Christian, perhaps the most interaction is with a cashier, or the guy/girl that is sometimes at the office water cooler at the same time, or the few times you sit near another on the train.

Privilege comes into this, because for the Americans I've seen/heard in my daily life (either talking about Muslims or going out of their way to try to insult me when they perceive me as a foreigner, or as a Muslim) are white and/or Christian, and it's easy to forget that there's benefits for being part of the majority religion, the one that most people are used to, the one that people don't see as threatening or foreign. It's easy to get afraid of the extremist Muslims out there and use your words to say "Islam is a threat" which paints a brush on every Muslim in the world, and only recant and say "oh no, I only meant the radicals" when someone says something about it.  To me, if someone said "blacks are a threat b/c X, Y, and Z" I'd say you were racist and not take any recant seriously, and I am sure many others would too; instead, it's fine here on Susan's to say "Muslims are a threat, b/c of X, Y, and Z", painting the stroke on every Muslim in the world, and that's perfectly fine to do here as I discovered and it's even condoned by some higher-ups. On Susan's, in the media, at work, etc. this type of outright Islamphobic speech of okay, most people don't even consider it to be hateful or unacceptable.

When you have privilege (whether it's white privilege in America, Muslim privilege in Saudi Arabia (although, in Saudi, you need to be the right kind of Muslim to get any privilege), able-bodied privilege anywhere, etc.), and you ignore your privilege, you can become another agent of repression. Instead of finding ways to be more inclusive, you can say "oh women/blacks/disabled folks/etc. are equal now" and continue on with the status quo because you don't even realize that things are tilted. It's fine to dislike extremist Muslims, or extremists of other faiths, who kill other people and repress others because they're doing something that's bad under any sort of moral viewpoint, but it's not acceptable to continue allowing broad stroked hatred to continue, and to allow ignorance to continue (while some people don't outright say hateful thigns against Muslims, in my daily life and here at Susan's I've heard/seen comments that show that many people don't even do some basic research).

Anyways, like I said before, I'll defend anyone who I perceive is getting the short end of the stick, whether you're Christian, white, Atheist, tan, rich, poor, whatever, I don't care. I take the "all men are created equal" part of the Constitution quite seriously, to me it truly means all people, not just the white, male, British descent, property owners like it was more thought of at the time it was written. America is reaching another turning point, we're expanding equality further than we have before (most recently is for LGBTs like we've been seeing more and more in the news), but we're seeing some people pop up saying that certain people should just leave the country (thanks Gina), should assimilate by taking the rags off their heads, and would like to see similar laws to France and Canada which were mainly instated with Muslims in mind to limit religious expression. By ignoring the privileges available to us, whoever we are, wherever we are, and allowing the furtherance of public displays of hate, we're setting ourselves up to be hurt in the future. If we continue view it as acceptable to hate minorities (religious, racial, ethnic, etc.), we're cutting off our own legs, there'll be nothing left to stand on, no defenses left when lenses shift.

As often attributed to Martin Niemöller:
QuoteFirst they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me

Anyways, that's my soap box. For those that see Islam as a threat, who still want those who are different to either fully assimilate or to "go home", continue on. I don't expect many of you to become less public in your hatred or to remember that in the future Christians could be treated the way Muslims/other visible religious minorities currently are in America because of my long-winded (and likely poorly written) post here.



Again, all from the point of view from an American, mixed-race, non-Christian who sometimes gets mistaken for Muslim, US Constitution lovin' transguy, who just wants to see everyone at least make an attempt to put hatred aside and treat others the same way we want to be.
ਮਨਿ ਜੀਤੈ ਜਗੁ ਜੀਤੁ
  •  

Gina_Z

Quote from: LearnedHand on November 04, 2013, 10:40:50 PM


It's just now that Muslims are the current people where it's totally acceptable to say hateful, stereotypical things about all over the place without even having to pretend you're not hateful

I think it's hateful for you to make such a generalization.

Certainly,  there are stupid people who make nasty generalized statements about Moslems, but to say it's a mainstream phenomenon is silly and just stirs up negative attitudes. Where's the data, the studies? When 9 out of 10 terrorists are self-described Muslims, that has an effect on people's attitudes. It's that simple. I think most people realize that those terrorists are not mainstream Muslims, but a fringe element. As for your idea about 'privilege', what would you like to see happen or changed? It comes across as vague whining without offering a solution. I don't think that's your intention. 

As for 'leaving the country', I was making the point that it is a severe contradiction to move to a country that you do not like. For what purpose? An example of the absurdity: A couple from middle America moving to Saudi Arabia and then not being happy about the treatment of women in that country. Ideally, people should leave a country for another country because they LIKE the new country better, often MUCH better. If a person is looking for acceptance, she should do what the Romans do, when in Rome. Act likable.

BTW, who exactly are they coming for? In my suburban neighborhood they are not coming for anyone. What's happening over by you? Why isn't the media covering it? Tell us all.

One last point- If you want to defend people, it works best when you specifically defend an individual, rather that a huge group of people. Why? because large groups of people behave in a wide variety of ways. Try to defend all southerners or all people in Montana and it just doesn't work. If you want to make a difference, choose an individual and defend them. Make a lot of friends. Show them love. Avoid contempt. Show forgiveness. One on one relationships have the most power, in terms of changing the world.
  •  

Shaina

Quote from: LearnedHand on November 04, 2013, 10:40:50 PM
As often attributed to Martin Niemöller:
Anyways, that's my soap box. For those that see Islam as a threat, who still want those who are different to either fully assimilate or to "go home", continue on. I don't expect many of you to become less public in your hatred or to remember that in the future Christians could be treated the way Muslims/other visible religious minorities currently are in America because of my long-winded (and likely poorly written) post here.

Stay up on that "soap box" I for one am quite enjoying learning about another perspective :)

Love that quote btw it's one of my Dad's favorites!
I was a child and she was a child   
    In this kingdom by the sea:   
But we loved with a love that was more than love—
    I and my Annabel Lee
  •  

Gina_Z

People who are oppressed, should be defended, but it's impossible to legislate 'love' or niceness. We often hear about individual acts of hate, but what about acts of love, between individuals? My niece has a new roommate this semester. She's a Muslim. So? They get along fine. Maybe we should explain the privilege thing to them. Or not. 
  •  

Shaina

I'm happy to hear your niece has a nice roomie Gina! Doesn't always work out that way :D

Oh and love cannot be legislated, I agree, but hate-specifically hate crimes-can definitely be addressed by the law. I think we get so desensitized by all the acts of hate you mentioned that we come to a point of acceptance. It can be tempting to just say, "There are always going to be intolerant people so we can't do x, y and z when it happens".

My grandmother felt like white privilege was a fact of life and that blacks speaking against it (or even acknowledging the existence of white privilege) during the civil rights era were fighting human nature. I wonder where we'd be if everyone thought like her? Or where we will be if we have the same attitude about other cultures, religions etc.? Just a thought.
I was a child and she was a child   
    In this kingdom by the sea:   
But we loved with a love that was more than love—
    I and my Annabel Lee
  •