Quote from: Jessica Merriman on February 18, 2014, 10:09:41 AM
No matter what continent we all live on it always seems to be this way. Money and bonus's over health and integrity. There is no way any of us will ever know the true causes of Transexualism, ever.
We're such socially complex creatures that you can't say anything to do with our psychology is 100 percent due to one thing, however there's plenty of evidence that a male gender identity later in life is largely the result of the action of testosterone during your prenatal brain development (and if there isn't testosterone present during that time, or it's unable to do its job, you end up with a female gender identity instead).
There are two medical conditions in which genetically male people are raised as female, that have wildy different outcomes as far as satisfaction with assigned gender is concerned: Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS), and Cloacal Exstrophy.
CAIS women have Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome, a condition that means the cells throughout their body are completely unable to detect or react to testosterone, so their prenatal development (including brain development) takes place as if there was no testosterone present.
Cloacal extrophy patients are actually normal baby boys, apart from a developmental abnormality which means they were born without a penis. They have functioning testicles though, so their prenatal brain development took place under the influence of normal male levels of testosterone. It's much easier to surgically construct a vagina rather than a penis for these patients, so the general practice for many years has been to castrate them shortly after birth, construct a vagina for them as part of the surgical repair for their condition, and raise them as girls.
Once their testicles are removed, these people are no longer able to produce testosterone, so are in basically the same situation as CAIS women as far as all their postnatal development is concerned - both groups are genetically male, however they look like and are raised as girls. The only difference is that for the cloacal extrophy patients, their brain development took place under the influence of male-typical testosterone levels, whereas prenatal development in CAIS patients takes place as if there was no testosterone present.
CAIS patients seem to be almost universally happy with a female identity, whereas assignment to female in cloacal exstrophy cases has turned out to be an unmitigated disaster:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1421517/"Discordant Sexual Identity in Some Genetic Males with Cloacal Exstrophy Assigned to Female Sex at Birth", N Engl J Med. 2004 January 22; 350(4): 333–341.
The paper studied 14 patients who were reassigned as female and two whose parents refused the reassignment.
Subjects 1 to 5 are, according to the paper, living as female:
"None had dated. None discussed sexual activity or sexual attractions (whereas three adolescent genetic females with cloacal exstrophy did). Parents noted in follow-up interviews that these subjects were generally content. However, the parents did not want these children to participate in follow-up interviews and answered all follow-up questions themselves."
Subjects 6 to 8 had an "unclear" sexual identity:
"Identifying herself as a female at the initial assessment at the age of 10 years, Subject 6 subsequently angrily refused to discuss her sexual identity with anyone after learning, at the age of 12, that her birth status was male. After 2½ years of suggestions from her physician, she recently began taking estrogen but continues to refuse to discuss sex. Subjects 7 and 8 have persistently and spontaneously declared their sexual identity as males since the age of nine years, before the initial assessment. They live as females because their parents have rejected their declarations."
The remaining 8 out of 14 reassigned patients had completely rejected a female identity and were living as males, as were the 2 whose parents had refused to allow their reassignment to female.