Okay, so, I'm starting to think that some of the global moderators (or someone else) might be using the warning system as a way to shut people up or perhaps punish them for opinions or approaches that they disagree with. Either it's that or they're so busy chatting and using the forums for personal reasons that they just don't get around to all their duties before doing personal things.
Either way, I got a warning today (a 20% warning, no less) for spamming. Problem one is that the warning had no reference to the offense in question. Problem two is that, as far as I can tell, this was something done *months* ago and either my new approach to feedback in a certain area irked someone and so they decided to find <something> to slap me with or someone complained months ago and they just never got around to their own inbox.
The description of the violation was terse, untimely, and feels like it was so arbitrary that it just smacks of unprofessionalism and lack of any sort of rules other than the whim of the mod/admin/whatever that put the warning in place.
The work I do here is for others. I try to help. I do not NEED this place (at all, in any way) but I *am* a well spoken, educated, moderate, patient, and generally well received member who tries to help new girls work through all the confusion and turmoil that comes from transitioning. The admin and mod staff that I have encountered has generally been entitled, dismissive, unengaged, and generally just treat this place like their own little playground where they can enforce things however they see fit with whatever engagement or lack thereof.
This has got to stop. The ToS are there for a reason but if your staff here doesn't set a list of rules about procedures, then the system is ripe for abuse and distrust. I love the work that I do here. I pretty much despise the staff. That's not a situation that you all should be happy about.
P.S. - I'd have handled this with the mod/admin in question but there was no discussion, no link to the originator of the warning, and no evidence of any sort about the issue. The anonymity of that action is yet another problem. If you're going to discipline someone, you should probably do it out in the open rather than pulling out something quite old and smacking a penalty from the shadows. If nothing else here were true, this fact alone would enrage me.