I'm inclined to agree with Suzi about the Guardian article but am curious to see this Time article
http://time.com/magazine/ starring Laverne Cox but apparently addressing transgender issues in general.
Going back to Suzi's comments, in France where many of the "tenors" of the TG community militate for the total abolition of gender, I have seen first hand just how inaudible the message is. Like it or not, I think most people on the planet are extremely attached to the notion of gender and that it is only people who are seriously conflicted about their own gender that give any serious thought to the subject. What belonging to one or the other gender means in terms of rights is a totally different question and since the cause of women's rights have progressed so much over the last 50 years and will no doubt continue to do as women's advantages in terms of educational achievement continue to make an impact, I even believe the notion of gender could become less of an issue for the vast majority of people.
So, while I am personally all for us coming out of the closet and pushing for our absolute right to live in the gender we identify with independently of our biological sex, I'm inclined to steer very clear of any suggestion that I'm for the abolition of gender per se.
As it happens, my experience of transitioning, especially the psychological effects of HRT, also convince me more than ever that there is a biological basis for some of the differences in behaviour corresponding to male and female stereotypes. My own behavioural changes, in terms of lowered aggressivity and far more emotivity have taken even me by surprise...