I generally agree with things Parker Molloy writes and this is no exception. Obviously it's necessary for some people to educate since resources wouldn't exist in the first place without those individuals but I don't think the expectation of education from every trans person displayed by many cis people is legitimate.
Educating people is, as identified in the article, emotionally draining and a form of labour. If somebody wants that labour but doesn't offer some form of compensation, whether emotional (e.g. committing to future support) or material (e.g. money for an educator's time), then I tend to see that as callous and egocentric. Sadly, that seems to be the majority of cases in my entirely personal experience. For me, it's indicative of the fact that many people seem to ask questions because they think it's perfectly reasonable to expect another human being to justify their fundamental existence, they're hiding toxic entitlement behind a façade of innocent exploration. As Molloy says, they are really often demanding and the fact they simply skip basic tact or empathy shows that.
Ultimately, I appreciate some form of investment in education is necessary (and I aim to do that in the future if I'm able or competent) and that some people earn education but I'd like to see a concomitant focus on teaching marginalisers that they have no inherent right to that education from the marginalised.