Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

FreeTom Sleek (4.5 in) Review - Maleth

Started by Maleth, September 07, 2014, 07:10:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Maleth

*cue drumroll* Laaaadies and gentlemeeeen... I present to you, MY REVIEW OF THE FREETOM SLEEK!!

Okay, where to start... First of all, I ordered the Sleek from their website from the Clearance Section for a reduced price (around 130 bucks) due to some miniscule indentations on the head (they were about 3mm long according to the website). I'd like for you to take note that these stated imperfections did NOT interfere with the function (or even appearance/realism) of my prosthetic. Infact it took me a really good long, close-up stare to actually notice the little indentations. Barely noticeable! My prosthetic also had the paint plus option and it was light brown. Oh yeah, and the one I had ordered didn't have a pleasure slide. No loss for me since I am Pre-T. Let's move on to the specifics now:


Appearance:
Looks: Wow. The appearance of this thing is ABSOLUTELY stunning to me. I don't think I've had a more realistic prosthetic to be honest. When I first got it out of the box, this just made me a little shocked. In all honesty I really liked how these looked in the pictures and it seems that they DO live up to the realism that shines in the pictures. The paint plus took it to a whole new level. The shaft has nice detailed veins, and if you can look close enough it has little indented pores that look super real. It's very nice to touch and after a washing it's only a tiny bit stickier which goes away. Someone in the reviews mention that it feels like clammy skin after/during a wash but my skin is honestly a bit clammy anyways so it fits with me personally. That "clamminess"/stickiness goes away with the moisture once it dries. The balls are a little less realistic than the shaft with less detail but they're still realistic and IMHO it doesn't really matter as much to me because the shaft area gets the most spotlight anyways. But yeah, the looks are VERY realistic! I was pleased with them. 10/10


Packing & Size:
The appearance blew me away, but the packing not so much. This thing is 4.5 inches which is fair enough for packing size. I've had experience with 4.5 packers before so I wasn't expecting a HUGE bulge (RM basic packer for example). But the thing is, it's not the size of this that is making packing difficult. It's the largeness of the dang cup surrounding it which adds area to the thing and the density of the silicone for that. Not to mention the packer is somehow made in a way that is supposed to pop right back up anytime there is no pressure on it and the silicone is a bit firmer than your usual packer since it's made for play as well. I understand where they're coming from by doing this but it makes packing inevitably hard (no pun intended). The silicone is a bit dense and it likes to resist against underwear to pop up and make your bulge look very boner-y. Positioning and keeping the packer down is easier with the rod inserted, HOWEVER the problem with this is that if anyone were to grope you, it feels like very much a hard penis in your pants. Without the rod it feels about semi-erect. This could be good and bad. It's good for if you need something in the heat of the moment, but bad for some certain situations (just think about it). I still don't know whether I prefer packing with or without the rod since I'm still getting used to this thing. I've been thinking about getting a jockstrap since that's what people recommend for this badboy but what I've used to pack with it so far was Peecock Products' underwear harness and a very tight pair of boxer briefs. A good piece of advice: This is not made to just pop into your undies. It WILL shift around, and that WILL be bad since it could really look like a boner easily. What I found to make the bulge a bit smaller was to place it lower than I usually do when packing (right at the end of my pelvis) so that the balls are literally in between my legs. It's hard to explain but if you have one and position it that way while packing it down you can notice a difference when wearing with pants. I would not recommend this for those new to packing or those who like to wear skinny jeans since it gives a good bulge. I'll probably update this section once I get a jockstrap or some sort of good harness. 5/10 for packing.

*I'd also like to note that I bought a Light Brown but was initially hesitant about it since I'm a little pale though I tanned over the summer. I compared the color of the Sleek to both my paler and my tanner skin areas and it matched both exceptionally well. I am satisfied with the skin color.


Peeing Feature:
I have peed with this only a couple times but I have to say that the learning curve is more or less equal to that of any other funnel STP/packer. To be honest since I hadn't used a funnel in a while, I spilled on my first try but luckily it was in the shower. I recommend to be in the shower or trying it without clothes on until you get comfortable with the receptable at least. I find that the funnel is a bit wide and I think it's a bit too steep but I like that the balls are hollow so you can get any extra drops out. As with any other funnel STP there are always [a few] leftover drops or moisture but that just has to be an adjustment. It's irritating for me initially but I learned to live with it when I packed with my Peecock. Honestly with this one you have to hold it almost at a directly down angle and hold the balls to your body as well as control your flow so there is no overflow but in time you can learn how to do it perfectly. The peeing is functional but I feel like the learning curve is a bit steep but they did what they could.. I usually pee without the rod inserted but with it would be a little more difficult as pee could get trapped between the rod and the prosthetic itself. It sounds unsanitary but if you practice regular hygiene (i.e. cleaning your prosthetic at least once DAILY and showering) then you should be good to go. Since it requires some learning and isn't perfect but it functions well once you get it down, I rate the STP an 8/10.


Play/Pleasure Feature:
I cannot write a full review on this due to two things: 1) I did not have a pleasure slide included with this one since I bought it off of clearance and 2) I haven't tested it out for play and that probably won't be for a while possibly. What I can say is that I will ask my SO's perspective on the thing after we have tested it and what they think of it. I will *definitely* update this part of the review as soon as it is tested and we have put our thoughts together on it. I reckon that the erection rod is very good not only for packing but also for the play feature so you can bend it in different directions to your heart's content. I think that the prosthetic without the rod would also work for play feature since it feels a bit dense and does collapse if *squeezed* with a hand but is still firm enough for play. It feels about semi-erect without the rod and fully erect with it. The feel is very nice and realistic so I imagine it would be very pleasurable for the receiving party. So ?/10 for the packing feature but I have good hopes for it.


Verdict: I think what makes this prosthetic shine over others is the sheer realism and attention to detail that makes it a good competitor to Peecock Products. I really liked the appearance initially and I think it lived up to the realism that they capture in their display pictures. It feels great in the hand and is a good size for packing and not too big, but those new to packing be warned: This is not one that can be tamed easily. It will try to pop up in your pants due to the way that it is constructed and its density, but I am sure a good harness with tight-ish (not too tight) pants might be able to keep this guy restrained. There's a learning curve to see what placement works for what kinds of pants but one can learn that with experience. I think the rod helps a little in packing but make sure you don't get groped at an odd time so it doesn't seem inappropriate. The STP functions well and will be great once you learn how to use it and yes there will be moisture but it's something you'll get used to. Verdict Rating: 7.6/10.



ADDITIONAL SECTION:

*Additional Note: When groped without the rod inside, the Sleek does make a quiet noise since it is hollow, and this persists when it is squeezed through underwear too. However, when worn with pants and underwear, there is no sound when squeezing the rod-less Sleek, so it doesn't seem to be a problem.

Comparison to Peecock:
I won't be giving a rating here, just a comparison between FreeTom and my Peecock. In comparison to my 4.5 Sleek, I have owned a 4 inch Peecock. They are very similar yet different. First of all, the Peecock's material is much squishier and softer than the Freetom's. It is easily collapsible and much more so due to the material. The cup/funnel of the Peecock seems to be a bit smaller and narrower than the Freetom which makes it easier to pack and the funnel inside of the Peecock is much smoother and has less of an incline to make the peeing process a bit more "with the flow". I haven't used the Peecock for play but I'm not sure how the pleasure set on the Peecock would work. I've spoken with some FTMs who used it and they said it kept falling off during play so they just had done away with it. Also, it's notable that the rod in the FreeToM is much harder to take out and seems to have a slight advantage because it is bendable in different directions and I'm almost sure it wouldn't slip out since it takes a bit of patience to pull out. As opposed to the FreeTom, the peecock's rod slides in much easier which would raise concerns of it sliding out during use and it's not bendable, in fact it was just a brittle rod. In terms of realism the FreeTom definitely wins hands down over the Peecock with coloring and with general appearance and feel. The peecock felt a bit too soft IMO and although it did have nice features and details such as veins, the balls were very very hard along with a weird texture, the coloring was quite flat and didn't match my skintone as well, etc. My final verdict would be for those who don't really have realism as their top priority and are very much new to packing then pick the Peecock. But in my opinion I like my FreeTom a bit better and I sure will 100% once I get the packing and the peeing down with some practice. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, it's just a matter of what is suitable for whom.


I'm constantly updating this review but please, if you guys have any questions feel free to post them in this thread!! The reason why I made this thread is so that there can be any questions posted and answered and so that we all have them in one place in regards to this specific item. Pictures will be posted upon request. PM me for the password.
~Maleth
  •  

Bimmer Guy

Thanks so much, Maleth, for writing this extensive review.

The question I have is this:  Will you/would you wear this as your everyday/daily packer?  Does it fit the bill?
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta: 3/2/16 (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty), (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta: 11/11/16 Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision.  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. (Crane, TX)
Fistula Repair 12/21/17 (UPenn Hospital,unsuccessful)
Fistula Repair 6/7/18 (Nikolavsky, successful)
Revision: 1/11/19 Replacement of eroded testicle,  mons resection, cosmetic work on scrotum (Crane, TX)



  •  

zero.cool.crash.override

Thanks for the excellent review, Maleth.  And thanks for the comparison to Peecock.  I have a Sleek as well, and I agree with you on packing with the thing.  Its natural position seems to be erect.  I've had the best luck with snug jock style underwear.  Jock isn't my preference in an undergarment, but it is sufficiently taught around the edges of the triangular pouch, so it holds the prosthetic in place pretty well.  At this moment, I am packing the Sleek in Andrew Christian Show-It briefs, which I really like, but after an hour or so of moderate movement, the dick tends to work its way up into a serious bulge.  I can say that I have gotten my hands on a 2-in-1 from FreeToM, and I can verify that the 2-in-1 is indeed softer than the 4-in-1, so it does lay flat a little easier. 

I'm curious about how well the STP functions for you.  I am able to confidently use it at home, at a toilet, while clothed.  However, I find that I need to open my pants all the way and then either (1) stick my hand all the way inside so that I can press the balls firmly up against me, or (2) lower the entire prosthetic an inch or more away from me until the opening at the base of the shaft is low enough to encourage the urine to flow the correct direction.  Neither of these options would be good at a public urinal.  Do you run into this issue?  I watched a couple of reviews on YouTube, and they didn't even mention it.  It seems that the idea is to flatten it out so that the receptacle space in the balls is about as high in elevation as the beginning of the shaft.  My sleek just doesn't do that.  I don't know if this is due to user error (mine), or inconsistent quality from FreeToM, or if other models (Traditional and Rogue) are designed for better function.  Also, does the hollow tube inside the shaft on yours line up properly with the hole/slit at the end of the head?  Mine does not, and this negatively effects flow. 
~Malachi Uriel

  •  

AdamMLP

A thought, would the jointed freetom rod fit into the peecock, or are they entirely different diameters?
  •  

zero.cool.crash.override

Quote from: lxndr on September 08, 2014, 01:05:49 AM
A thought, would the jointed freetom rod fit into the peecock, or are they entirely different diameters?
I have wondered that as well.

With all due respect the creative ingenuity of FreeToM for recognizing an application of it inside a prosthetic, the flexible rod inside the 4-in-1 is made by this company: http://www.loc-line.com/index.html .  As far as I can see, it could be inserted into any packer or player that you already own.  As for exact diameter and length, the Loc-Line company manufactures all different sizes.

It is stiff, flexible, and pose-able, but it will not compress upon itself.  On the other hand, the inside of it is ridged and bumpy, which makes it less than ideal for the smooth flow of urine. 
~Malachi Uriel

  •  

AdamMLP

I knew they could be brought separately, but not where from so I couldn't check the diameters and that was the easiest way to describe it. I was thinking of using it for the sex purpose as apparently the peecock's erection looks a bit sad, but I haven't received mine yet.
  •  

Maleth

Hi guys, thanks for your responses.

@Brett: I'll answer your questions in two parts: First of all, I think I will be wearing this as my go-to packer but before I do that, I will need to wear it at home a lot to get used to it. I think that due to the functionality (a strength of this product) and versatility that it is definitely worth what I paid for ($129) and the practice that it takes to get used to packing. Though I can only speak for how much *I* paid which was NOT the full price. I can't speak on the account of someone who paid 170-190 ish USD for a perfect prosthetic though I think their pricing is fair for the most part and highly competitive for Peecock. The realism IMHO really shines through and for the Peecock that was just a feature that I was let down by.

@Zero.Cool.Crash.Override: You're welcome, it was my pleasure to write this for you guys. I agree that the natural erected form of it tends to be annoying for packing but oh well. I'll definitely try to get my hands on a jockstrap and modify to fit my needs. I think that something perfect to pack with this prosthetic is something that can hold it really well and in place. I think that a temporary fix for it riding up and creating a bulge is to keep an eye on it and adjust yourself (even if public, because cismen do it too!). But yeah, it's still a problem. I also have the same issue with the STP, and I'm really learning it still. But as practicing with underwear I noticed that I have that problem too. I must bring it down lower than I am used to for both packing and for STPing so it works with both things. I think that it's partially a learning curve users must hurdle and also something they could improve in future designs to be honest. Just in personal experience it feels very... steep. Almost too steep for the pee to go upwards unless the thing is in between my legs and pointed almost downwards directly. I also haven't really noticed any mis-alignment in mine without the rod and just the hollow prosthetic. I'd like to note though that it's a bit harder for flow to travel with the rod. Either way if I ever order from them again I'm gonna stay with the Sleek because if I find this one to be big I can only imagine how users of the Rogue/Traditional feel...

@Lxndr: I don't own my Peecock anymore but the silicone was very soft and almost delicate on that one.. I reckon *maybe* you could slide that rod in but I don't think it would be too compatible because the rod could erode against the very soft silicone and cause your peecock to tear at some areas. Mine had little tears and bumps even though I didn't use it a lot. I think the material they used was not extremely durable.. It was silicone but made of a different kind or blend even because it was very unlike the silicone that is used by RM and FreeToM. I think FreeToM and RM use very high quality silicone and am pleased.

~Maleth
  •  

bambam

Awesome review buddy! Glad to see you got it up, this has given me a lot to think about.


  •  

WooKiseob

Thanks for the review! Very informative  ;D.
  •  

SWNID

Thanks for your review!!!
I thought you have mentioned this on other threads that you also ordered a eroticreation 3 in 1? Have you received it? How do you compare eroticreation with freetom or peecock? Thanks!
  •  

Maleth

Hi guys! I appreciate anyone who took the time to read my review. Hope it helped at least a little. As a little update, I found a pair of old jock shorts (shorts and a jock all in one.. I bought it on ebay a while ago) and tried packing with them and found that my results were much better. So my recommendation is to get yourself a good, tight jockstrap and have that as a harness. It'll contain the prosthetic well..


@SWNID; I ordered a 6.5 3 in one initially but then he allowed me to change my order to the 5 inch since they're the same price on the same day I paid.. He said that it was going to be shipped out by last Tuesday I think.. Not sure where it is now. Will also post a review on that.

Edit: Had a little photoshoot with my prosthetic. Tried to take a few different angles and also zoomed in on some parts to highlight the detail. Will post soon. PM me for password, it will be a private album.
~Maleth
  •  

SWNID

  •  

Maleth

Ugh, photobucket sucks. I tried to upload my pictures on there and gave people the password, and they couldn't get in on the album last night. Next afternoon I come online to fix it and now some of the pictures were removed. Sorry guys X_X I'll find a way to repost them somehow (though I deleted them off my phone). Anyone have suggestions for good photo websites to make a locked album with a password on?

On a side note, I trimmed my FreeToM Sleek (the upper funnelish part) of any extra silicone that was getting in the way of my packing and trimmed a little bit of it and I have to say it feels much better in my pants that way. And looks a bit less bulky in pants as well as feels lighter and easier to compress. It wasn't difficult to do either and I was very careful and could trim off some little parts at first to get a feel for it and then trimmed off some more. Thanks to user Zero Cool Crash Override for this great tip!
~Maleth
  •  

aleon515

IMO, this guy needs to use the scissors for a little bit of trimming. This is way too much silicone for most people.

I use imgur. Not a huge fan but it is easy enough.

--Jay

Quote from: Maleth on September 11, 2014, 03:13:01 PM
Ugh, photobucket sucks. I tried to upload my pictures on there and gave people the password, and they couldn't get in on the album last night. Next afternoon I come online to fix it and now some of the pictures were removed. Sorry guys X_X I'll find a way to repost them somehow (though I deleted them off my phone). Anyone have suggestions for good photo websites to make a locked album with a password on?

On a side note, I trimmed my FreeToM Sleek (the upper funnelish part) of any extra silicone that was getting in the way of my packing and trimmed a little bit of it and I have to say it feels much better in my pants that way. And looks a bit less bulky in pants as well as feels lighter and easier to compress. It wasn't difficult to do either and I was very careful and could trim off some little parts at first to get a feel for it and then trimmed off some more. Thanks to user Zero Cool Crash Override for this great tip!
  •