Quote from: ChrisRokk on October 19, 2014, 02:30:30 PM
Oh hey I found that link if it helps improve anyone's self esteem.
http://www.boredpanda.com/athlete-body-types-comparison-howard-schatz/
Thanks for posting that, it's interesting. It shows how specialized the human body can become, and how different strong and/or healthy can look.
Take away the bronzer/body oil/whatever and the professional lighting, put them in an everyday setting and for most of them I would not see them and think, "Hey, that guy must be one of the world's finest athletes."
But they are.
Quote from: Satyrane on October 19, 2014, 07:08:14 PM
So it seems to me (correct me if I'm misunderstanding the flow of this conversation) that the crux of this issue is that we are pursuing an idealized image of manhood; understandable seeing as where are starting point is but potentially self-esteem destroying due to a variety of limitations. A solution I have discovered to this problem for myself is to realize there are a plethora of ways to be a man, something that even are cisgender counterparts can be woefully unaware of.
In the household I grew up in, I was raised to believe that the most important virtue is the pursuit of knowledge (a belief I still hold dear). As a result, the men I saw as role models where scrawny intellectuals such as Carl Jung and Joseph Campbell. In my head, the image of the idealized man was based upon his mind and not his muscle. Manhood in the image of scholar is only one of many other archetypes we as people can strive for. Not all of us can or want to fit a single image so we must encourage the freedom to diversify and find one's own niche.
Yeah, you have the crux right. Idealized media images screw badly with cis people's heads, stack the effects of dysphoria on that, most likely provide even less opportunity than cis counterparts to see enough "average" bodies for comparison to the ideal, and you have a recipe for hardcore body image problems.
Unfortunately several components of my "ideal" are physical things I can do little to nothing to change. We could start a "I wish I had bigger, manlier hands" club here. I'm doing everything I'm reasonably able to do to change my hands and it makes some difference. And it helps to know there are cis guys in the same boat. But the bottom line is I may never look at my hands and NOT have that moment of, "WTF,
this is what my hands look like?"
Further partial remedy ideas:
-Take pride in the changes I have made, even if they are small I've worked hard for them. That's respectable in itself.
-Try to focus more on things I have more control over.
- Keep eyes open for guys with similar issues that I respect for other things, to further shift priority away from crap I can't change. "Yep that guy has tiny hands, but he is brilliant at ____ so who gives a crap."
- Analyse
why I value that trait so much. Is it 100% just a matter of it being male typical, or is there another factor present, possibly one I have some control over? Maybe a physical trait represents something.
I'll take a crack at it right here. To me muscular, rough hands imply physical strength, capability, and hard work. I know a big chunk of my problem is that bigger hands are more typical for males, but I also value those implied aspects. And those are things I not only have some control over, but I'm already making progress on. Can't change my bone structure but I am adding muscle and calluses. As for capability I know full well that one can have heaps of that without big hands, and vice-versa, I've known some incompetent people with big hands.