Hi ladies! I'm at a point where I'll soon be considering how to proceed with GRS. As a woman who has found herself in the unfortunate position of having been born with a doodle I am quite keen to have that corrected.
Up until now my sex life has been massively mediocre - I am attracted to women but can't really relate to them sexually the way I'd like to whilst I am endoodled! As such, despite the fact I'd love to be in a loving relationship with a wonderful woman, I've always considered myself as not much of a sexual person.
I was talking to my gender counsellor today about this and another related dilemma. Now he said that it was quite common for people's sexual expression to change for the better post-op. It was something that I hadn't really considered before but it does make a lot of sense.
And see, this is the source of my second dilemma. I had considered just getting cosmetic GRS - labia, plumbing and clit without bothering with inversion to create a neo-vag - primarily because I just don't fancy the idea of dilation. My "logic" goes thus... I like women, don't want to be in a relationship with a guy or be penetrated by one, so why go to the effort of a ne-vag that requires dilation? My counsellor pointed out - and certainly I had already considered this already - that penetration can happen between women... fingers amongst other things.
Sometimes I wonder if I'll ever find myself in a relationship with a woman as a woman anyway (negative, I know) - so again, why bother with a neo-vag and dilation? But now I have a suspicion that this might be the doodle talking, without it I might very well feel more likely to express my sexuality and seek out a partner; in which case I'm likely to need that dilated neo-vag.
At the core of it I'm a bit of a circular mind trap... I don't know how much I'd regret not getting a neo-vag because I don't know the true depth of my sexual expression because the fact I was born with a doodle gets in the way of experiencing my true sexual expression...