It looks like that the volume injected may indeed alter absorption rates. Not that it matters much, as now I can't get either concentration until the pharmacy and doctor can work together. That's what i get for questioning authority...again.
For the curious, the results of a quick, shallow query:
"There is evidence that using smaller volumes aids absorption" (John and Stevenson, 1995)
and,
Effect of dosing volume on intramuscular absorption rate of aminoglycosides.
Pfeffer M, Van Harken DR.
J Pharm Sci. 1981 Apr;70(4):449-52.
Abstract
The Loo-Riegelman method was applied to serum amikacin level data after intravenous and intramuscular administration. Intramuscular amikacin absorption can be described by first-order kinetics, but the absorption rate constant decreased from 1.95 hr-1 at a 125-mg dose to 1.00 hr-1 at a 750-mg dose. This rate change apparently is a physical phenomenon due to differing dosing volumes at different doses and attendant changes in the surface area to volume ratio at the injection site. Amikacin absorption rates on intramuscular injection can be maximized by giving several smaller injections rather than a single larger injection. This phenomenon should be generally observed with aminoglycoside antibiotics and could be partly responsible for reported variations in the absorption rate and the poor predictability of serum concentrations.
(from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/722996 )
also:
Tanaka et al 1974 and Hirano et al. 1981 indicate "the absorption rate is not dependent on the initial drug concentration. In contrast a significant decrease of the absorption rate is observed with the increase of the injection volume [...] The absorption rate of a drug from an oily depot is only minimally affected by the viscosity of the vehicle.
(from: Neglected Factors in Pharmacology and Neuroscience Research: Biopharmaceutics, Animal Characteristics, Maintenance, Testing Conditions
by V. Claassen, J.P. Huston -Editor)