Hi Teri Anne,
Thanks for starting this thread. I've been following it since the beginning.

Just wanted to address one subtopic for now:
Quote from: Teri Anne on January 24, 2006, 05:01:37 AM
As I've said, I DO believe someone named Jesus lived and he died on the cross. So, Roman records of his death are good but don't get to the heart of the matter: Was he REALLY THE son of God?
Ah, the question with the potentially priceless answer. It gets into what some call the "Trilemma" and it is framed by the quote jamesBrine was looking for by C.S. Lewis: "You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come up with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us." Considering Jesus claimed to be God (not just the "son" of God, as we are "children of God", but "one with God", the Christ, the promised Messiah/Savior, I AM [that is, Yahweh or YHWH, the name God gave when Moses asked for His name, so revered by Jews that they would not speak it] (I found
http://www.probe.org/content/view/90/77/ for more background on his claims), he was either insane, it was a hoax (i.e. he was a liar), or he actually was God.
He could have been a liar. Cassie pointed out it would have made more sense for him to recant rather than die; you pointed out he could have accepted death for achieving the benefits of martyrdom. Always possible, although if not to bring good news and salvation, it is tough to ascertain what exactly his objectives were. It is hard to believe it was a hoax for the sake of the hoax, considering his teachings. It is probably more reasonable to think he was trying to change Jewish culture for "the better", although most of his teachings were too radical to really be considered part of the Jewish culture (one reason why they hated him) and arguably for most of his teachings to have any real merit, he sort of had to fulfill the part about him being God ("I am the bread of life", "I am the living water", "I am the way, the truth, and the life", "I am the true vine" [i.e. giver of life], his true followers must "take up your cross and follow me", he told a rich man that to inherit eternal life he should give up all his possessions to the poor and follow him...etc, etc). It is also tough to understand what "bettering" Israel would have accomplished since it was under Roman occupation at the time (and he apparently didn't care much for overthrowing them.)
He could have been insane. Considering the teachings attributed to him though, it can be tough to believe that he was insane about his being deity and yet produced lucid and profound teachings that people are actually inspired by to this day. But yes, possible that he could have convinced himself and everyone around him. I tend to like the possibility of insanity more than the possibility of his being a liar.
To go back to what you said though, you said you believe someone named Jesus lived and died on a cross. I'd like to acknowledge that the story doesn't stop there. Lying about being God or actually believing that you're God is one thing, but actually rising from the dead is another. There is no doubt in my mind that this man Jesus died. Crucifixion in itself is bad enough, but Romans made sure people died by breaking their legs if they didn't die quickly enough (so they would suffocate). Apparently, Jesus didn't have his legs broken because he had already died (though he did get a spear through his side anyway.) So, he died and was buried, as the story goes, in a tomb. As Wendy already pointed out:
Quote from: Wendy on January 08, 2006, 11:50:03 PM
If you recall the tomb of Jesus was guarded by a squad of Roman soldiers and the stone in front of the tomb would take 10 strong men to move. In the days of the Romans any soldier that left his post would be put to death. A Romain soldier would die before leaving his post. Somehow Jesus got out of the tomb.
I think it would be tough to argue that Jesus' tomb wasn't empty and the stone wasn't rolled away. Who the heck would even say that when any fool could see the stone was still there, or people could prove a body was in there by opening up the tomb? There's also the question of how any of Jesus' followers would have gotten past the guard. Then, the account of women being the first to see him: if you were making something up, that's not a smart move - women weren't considered valid eyewitnesses in the Jewish culture. I suppose the sticking point here though is who believed afterward and what happened to them. Jesus' disciples and even
his family believed they saw him resurrected and believed at that point He was God and started to really understand why he had come to earth. They then went on to proclaim this belief to the death (Peter was crucified upside-down, his brother James was stoned to death, to name a few). It is hard to believe Jesus' disciples or his family would believe this unless he actually did appear to them (multiple times, apparently), or that they would willingly die for a lie when Jesus' martyrdom in itself could have been sufficient, as you pointed out. Yes, maybe they were all part of one heck of an elaborate hoax. But a hoax isn't fun when you're not around to enjoy it and dying for a hoax when you have no real plan for life after death isn't too logical. It also seems unlikely that they were all just collectively insane. Also... your family? The people who saw you with snot coming out of your nose as a kid? If you think it's hard to get your family to accept you, try telling them that you're God and that if they believe in you, they will have eternal life. Yet this is what they believed - James even calls himself the bond-servant of Jesus, his brother.
Phew, I wrote more than I intended. I should caveat that I do not intend to "convince you" of anything but hope that these thoughts will be usable to you in your search for God (or lack thereof). I also don't think my reasoning is 'bulletproof' and look forward to further discussion.
All the best,
Joseph