Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

Buying a packer. Which do you think looks more realistic?

Started by Josh11, January 04, 2016, 05:46:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


vanderpn

These two were among my top contenders when I was looking for a new packer. I ended up with the Reelmagik, and I'm really happy with it.

I think the foreskin on the Reelmagik is a little more realistic; I feel like the foreskin on the Freetom looks a little thick.

I'm not sure what the back will look like on the Freetom since it's not the STP; the back of the Reelmagik looks like this:



You might try searching this sub-forum for both of these packers to see what other guys' experiences are. Good luck on your decision :)
  •  

RaptorChops

I also have the reelmagik packer and i'm happy with it. It does slip around a little bit though. By far the details on the RM are much better. Also the nice thing on the RM is the balls. They hang down a bit and they're squishy. Freetom balls are solid and they don't have squish to them.  The only plus side to freetom is the paint upgrade. Just my opinion, goodluck :D
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I dunno.
  •