Quote from: Laurie on June 05, 2017, 03:46:42 PM
You wouldn't have had anything to do with this suspected "really bad day" the young lady may have had, would you?
At one point I said " They will ask you if I said to you that your were being discriminatory. So you do understand they will want to ask you some very close questions about what you said . They normally do in these kinds of cases" She Said "What do you mean"
"I said when the solicitor cross examines you"
"Sorry SIR I don't understand"
"When we are in court and they are cross examining you as to what you said and did so as to establish your liability in the discrimination case. I can't imagine that calling me Sir after I have asked you 6 times now not to do that and of course your subsequent actions, and if you call me Sir again I will ensure your name in number one on that litigation list"
I told her up front I was trans and what I needed to do and right up until she told me it was too hard to use my name I was prepared to actually make a compromise just to get the account name changed, once this was said I stuck to my guns. She knew she was in all sorts of trouble when she refused to put me through to a supervisor. and I asked her repeatedly very politely if she was refusing to put me through to a supervisor. Side track, change of subject etc etc
It was all sorts of things like telling me two forms of photo ID (as Liz) were required to be presented along with "supporting evidence" I informed her that this is not a legal requirement but maybe a Telco one...Nope she told me it was South Australian Law...nope you are wrong and if you insist you are being discriminatory because I could ring your company today and order thousands of dollars of products and still not have supply any more than a photo copy of a licence and probably not even that because you have identified me.
So will check my account today some time and see if the changes have been made.