Another new photo... did you just get younger?
I don't think its really possible to evaluate surgeons in a rigorous way. You really need to see lots of post-op results, and how many people can do that? You'd also need statistics on complications, again not available.
I've seen a bunch of photo's of results from Suporn (and one in person), some from Brassard, and possibly none from Dr Chett, PAI, McGinn, Bowers, UK/Australian surgeons apart from whats on their websites. It makes it difficult to compare them.
As far as I understand it Suporn has the major claim to something different, and Dr Chett is copying some of it. I think in Dr Suporn's case at least it goes far beyond just using scrotal skin, as he also reuses as much of the existing material as he can. I don't think Dr Chett does this, or at least to the same extent.
Dr Suporn keeps it a secret, but its unclear to me why. I'm sure others could work it out if they cared. Perhaps its some cultural or personal thing. Perhaps he's just very careful with his work and doesn't want to entrust his patients to anyone else - I could personally relate to that kind of thinking.
You had really good reasons to get the time under GA down, but that doesn't apply to me or probably even most people. People don't seem to be dying because of GA. Maybe there's an increased incidence of post-op depression from GA?
Perhaps I'm being pedantic, but are really some bad surgeons in Thailand with plenty of practice. Its kind of like saying McDonalds have good quality food, which is actually true in the technical sense.