Susan's Place Logo

News:

Visit our Discord server  and Wiki

Main Menu

What Are Normal Blood Estradiol Levels for MTF on Injection E for 3.5 months??

Started by anamarisol24, April 27, 2016, 07:45:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

anamarisol24

 ??? ??? Hi I have recently switched to IV/Injectable E and am a bit worried about my blood E levels.   My Dr checked my labs and said it might be too high and may have to switch me back to the pills.  I am not a great pill taker as I then to forget any kind of pills, so I loved the idea of starting on self injections of Estradiol Valerate.  I didnt get to see the lab values of the E when we had them drawn back in Feb/Mar but she said it may be a bit too high.   I had my blood redrawn on Monday (4/25/16) and got the results back yesterday and it read that my estradiol levels is:   471 ng/ml

it does not give ranges for whats normal but says needs interpretation.  I do not want to switch back to the pill.  Is there another alternative or possibility of lowering a dosage of the injectable?   ??? I am currently on 1ml IM every 2 weeks. 

Anyone have any suggestions or comments on if this is normal range or not?   :'( :'( :'( ??? ??? ??? ??? ???
  •  

Dena

Welcome to Susan's Place. The blood levels are a bit on the high side depending on when the test was run. Higher levels are are seen just after inject and low before just before the next injection. If you are high, the doctor will reduce the dosage to bring the levels to what the doctor is targeting. Some people find their body retains estrogen better than others so they require lower dosages to maintain the correct levels. I don't think you have anything to worry about.
The link will show you the normal ranges.
http://www.hemingways.org/GIDinfo/hrt_ref.htm

We issue to all new members the following links so you will best be able to use the web site.

Things that you should read




Rebirth Date 1982 - PMs are welcome - Use [email]dena@susans.org[/email] or Discord if your unable to PM - Skype is available - My Transition
If you are helped by this site, consider leaving a tip in the jar at the bottom of the page or become a subscriber
  •  

Saki

I'm not sure what normal levels are. I'm not a doctor. It various from person to person i think. I have heard around 200 is a good place to be. After 14months I'm still at 64 . I switched to patches so hopefully it will get it higher.

<3 Alexis


  •  

Laura_7


Quote from: KayXo on April 24, 2016, 10:54:56 AM
It is not unusual for E levels to be very high on intramuscular estradiol. Pregnant women have levels as high as 75,000 pg/ml (275,000 pmol/L) and their risk of clots is less than 0.2%. In men, levels as high as 700 pg/ml (2570 pmol/L) were found not to increase risk of clots. Pregnancy does not cause prolactinoma and in fact, has been associated with recovery from this condition while, for breast cancer, an inverse association has been noted. There would be no good reason to halve dose based on the current studies at hand but follow doctor's order, as always. :)

On intramuscular E, T levels will be sufficiently suppressed due to high E levels and rarely need the addition of an anti-androgen.

Quote from: KayXo on April 24, 2016, 10:49:55 AM
Cisfemales' levels can range from 20 pg/ml (73 pmol/L) to as high as 650 pg/ml (2,386 pmol/L) during a menstrual cycle and up to 75,000 pg/ml (275,000 pmol/L) during pregnancy. Your E is certainly not above normal. Pregnancy is a normal part of a woman's life.

In summary with weekly injections its not uncommon to reach levels over 900 pg/ml the first days.
Many trans people do this without adverse effects.
Its possible this drives down t all by itself, without anti androgen. This is considered safe only with internal application.
Anti androgens all have side effects so being able to go without can be a plus in the longer term.

Studies showing adverse efects of high e levels usually are based on oral intake, which can raise blood clotting because the liver presumes a leak if it encounters estrogen in the digestive tract, and studies done with non bioidentical forms of estrogen.

Many endos and clinics primarily watch overall health, feminization and how the client feels and are not too fixed on exact levels because people may react individually.

Talk it all through with your doc/endo.


hugs
  •  

KayXo

Quote from: anamarisol24 on April 27, 2016, 07:45:50 PM
??? ??? Hi I have recently switched to IV/Injectable E and am a bit worried about my blood E levels.   My Dr checked my labs and said it might be too high and may have to switch me back to the pills.  I am not a great pill taker as I then to forget any kind of pills, so I loved the idea of starting on self injections of Estradiol Valerate.  I didnt get to see the lab values of the E when we had them drawn back in Feb/Mar but she said it may be a bit too high.   I had my blood redrawn on Monday (4/25/16) and got the results back yesterday and it read that my estradiol levels is:   471 ng/ml

Are you sure the units are ng/ml? More likely, they are pg/ml. If so, I personally see no reason to be concerned especially considering you are taking bio-estradiol non-orally. I am not a doctor though. Perhaps, you can share the following with your doctor.

Levels in ciswomen can reach 650 pg/ml during a menstrual cycle (http://www.specialtylabs.com/clients/outreach/web/site/details.asp?tid=44312&cid=301&keyword=), 75,000 pg/ml during pregnancy. Women aren't dying left and right, embolism risk remains very low during pregnancy, at less than 0.02%.

A study in men with prostate cancer aged 49-91, found that parenteral estradiol with levels going as high as 700 pg/ml, did not increase health risks.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec;169(6):1549-53.

"As serum estradiol levels increased throughout each phase (maximum mean estradiol 739.8 pg/ml)"

"Down-regulation of the fibrinolytic system was observed as estradiol levels increased. However, thrombin formation did not change, thus suggesting that elevated circulating estradiol alone does not predispose to a thromboembolic event."

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Oct;97(10):917-21.

"There is some anxiety about the possible harmful sequelae of supraphysiological estradiol levels but no data are currently available to show any deleterious effects of these levels on coagulation factors, blood pressure, glucose tolerance or the occurrences of endometrial or breast cancer (Hammond et al. 1974; Thom et id. 1978; Studd B Thom 1981; Armstrong 1988)."

Interestingly, an inverse association has been found between breast cancer and pregnancy.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 May;12(5):452-6.
http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content-nw/full/12/5/452/T1

These levels were obtained just before labor/delivery, at the end of pregnancy which lasted on average, 38 weeks.

Mean estradiol levels (E2): 24,000 pg/ml, Range: from 800-75,000 pg/ml

http://www.ilexmedical.com/files/PDF/Estradiol_ARC.pdf

"If conception occurs, estradiol levels continue
to rise, reaching levels of 1,000-5,000 pg/mL during the first trimester,
5,000-15,000 pg/mL during second trimester, and 10,000-40,000 pg/mL
during third trimester. 6-8"

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;26(6):469-75.

« Venous thromboembolism is, in the developed world, a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality during pregnancy or early after delivery, with a reported incidence ranging from 0.49 to 2.0 events per 1000 deliveries."

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Nov 15;143(10):697-706.

"Women with deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism first diagnosed between 1966 and 1995, including women with venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or the postpartum period (defined as delivery of a newborn no more than 3 months before the deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism event date, including delivery of a stillborn infant after the first trimester)."

« The relative risk (standardized incidence ratio) for venous thromboembolism among pregnant or postpartum women was 4.29 (95% CI, 3.49 to 5.22;P < 0.001), and the overall incidence of venous thromboembolism (absolute risk) was 199.7 per 100,000 woman-years. The annual incidence was 5 times higher among postpartum women than pregnant women (511.2 vs. 95.8 per 100,000), and the incidence of deep venous thrombosis was 3 times higher than that of pulmonary embolism (151.8 vs. 47.9 per 100,000). Pulmonary embolism was relatively uncommon during pregnancy versus the postpartum period (10.6 vs. 159.7 per 100,000). "

"Among pregnant women, the highest risk period for venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism in particular is during the postpartum period." (When estrogen levels drop and are low)

Cancer. 2005 Feb 15;103(4):717-23.
Phase II study of transdermal estradiol in androgen-independent
prostate carcinoma.


"Patients with prostate carcinoma progressing after primary hormonal therapy received TDE"

"The mean (+/-95% CI) serum estradiol level
increased from 17.2 pg.mL (range, 14.8-19.6 pg/mL) to 460.7 pg/mL
(range, 334.6-586.7 pg/mL)."

"No change in factor VIII activity, F 1.2, or
resistance to activated protein C was observed, whereas a modest
decrease in the protein S level was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In
patients with APIC, TDE was well tolerated and produced a modest
response rate, but was not associated with thromboembolic
complications or clinically important changes in several coagulation
factors."

Median age of patients was 75 (49-91).

Am J Clin Oncol. 1988;11 Suppl 2:S101-3.

"Serum concentrations of testosterone (T) and estradiol-17 beta (E2) were analyzed in prostatic cancer patients treated with polyestradiol phosphate (PEP) i.m. every fourth week as single drug therapy during a 6 month period."

"Accumulation of E2 occurred to mean levels 1,300-2,500 pmol/L at 6 months"

"No cardiovascular side effects occurred during single-drug PEP treatment."

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1993 Mar 10;113(7):833-5
Endocrine treatment of prostatic cancer. A renaissance for parenteral
estrogen.


"38 patients have been treated at Huddinge Hospital in Stockholm, and
14 patients at Aker Hospital in Oslo, with polyoestradiol phosphate
(Estradurin) injected intramuscularly every 4th week"

"Morbidity and mortality from cancer are
the same as may be achieved by surgical orchidectomy. The only side
effect of significance is gynaecomastia. Follow-up of the patients
does not indicate any increased risk of thrombosis or cardiovascular
disease.
"

Prostate 1989;14(4):389-95

"Oral estrogen therapy for prostatic cancer is clinically effective
but also accompanied by severe cardiovascular side effects.
Hypertension, venous thromboembolism, and other cardiovascular
disorders are associated with alterations in liver metabolism. The
impact of exogenous estrogens on the liver is dependent on the route
of administration and the type and dose of estrogen. Oral
administration of synthetic estrogens has profound effects on
liver-derived plasma proteins, coagulation factors, lipoproteins, and
triglycerides, whereas parenteral administration of native estradiol
has very little influence on these aspects of liver function.
"

My own levels range from 1,000-4,000 pg/ml. Clotting times are normal, everything else is normal. My doctors see no reason to lower my dose.

Also this study in transsexual women, where high dose intramuscular estradiol valerate (and medium to high dose oral E2) was given and yet, there were no incidences of thrombosis.

Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 27, No. 5, 1998

"The incidence of thromboembolic events during cross-
gender hormone treatment in our patients was zero."

Quoteit does not give ranges for whats normal but says needs interpretation.  I do not want to switch back to the pill.  Is there another alternative or possibility of lowering a dosage of the injectable?   ??? I am currently on 1ml IM every 2 weeks. 

Anyone have any suggestions or comments on if this is normal range or not?   :'( :'( :'( ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

Show this to your doctor. Ask what they base themselves on, what studies exactly they have in mind for them to decide to lower your dose. Have they measured clotting times? Are all other results (liver enzymes, etc.) normal?

Quote from: Laura_7 on April 28, 2016, 05:02:24 AM
Studies showing adverse efects of high e levels usually are based on oral intake, which can raise blood clotting because the liver presumes a leak if it encounters estrogen in the digestive tract, and studies done with non bioidentical forms of estrogen.

No such studies. The studies in transsexual and ciswomen (and men with prostate cancer) showing an increase in health risks comprised of oral non bio-identical estrogen such as conjugated equine estrogens or ethinyl estradiol. Nothing to do with levels, more to do with the type of estrogen used because it is difficult to metabolize by the body, remains longer in the body, circulates through portal vein many more times where it triggers estrogen receptors and causes changes in coagulation (an evolutionary mechanism to stop bleeding after pregnancy because animal eats placenta).
I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •