Quote from: autumn08 on May 02, 2016, 05:32:57 AM
I'm curious how you think men would be viewed if they were held to the same standards as women. For example, what if Donald Trump was Donna Trump?
My mind boggles at trying to imagine a female Donald Trump. The closest I can get to it is Sarah Palin.
Palin and Trump are similar in their overall outlook and their avoidance of any systematic world view. Both just arrive at policy positions based on guesswork, prejudices, and a gut instinct for what will appeal to backwards white voters. (My favorite Donald Trump line of all time, right after the Nevada caucuses: "I love the poorly educated!")
That said, there are some real differences. Palin is deeply involved with right-wing evangelical Christian dogma. While Trump claims Christian affiliation, it's clear that his religious views are shallow and conventional and play little role in influencing his thoughts or actions. (Example: speaking to right-wing evangelicals at Liberty University and referring to "Two Corinthians" instead of "Second Corinthians.")
Palin's speeches often deteriorate into incomprehensible gibberish. (Maybe it's a form of poetry rather than oratory?) Trump's speeches are easier to follow, but they almost always deal with just a single subject: Donald Trump.
Trump has been way more successful than Palin, but he had an enormous head start due to his immense wealth and decades of publicity from his business and entertainment enterprises. Palin is also held back by the simple fact that women have more trouble being taken seriously in American politics.
On the whole, I think if Donald Trump were Donna Trump, we wouldn't be seeing the current political situation where Trump is the front runner for the Republicans. Donna Trump would have just been a minor political sideshow and would have been filtered out of the campaign like Carly Fiorina was.
I don't like Hillary Clinton much, but I have to admit her political career is remarkable. Her whole public image is distorted through a bizarre lens of media expectation of what women politicians should be and how they should behave. There's constant focus and commentary on what she's wearing, and how she does her hair, and whether she "cackles" when she laughs. Despite all that, nobody can seriously doubt that she's an A-List political figure, and that's quite an achievement.
I suspect later women politicians may find the going easier because Clinton has broken through the stereotypes in the way she has. I look forward to watching Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren for the future.
And FrancisAnn is right. Donna Trump has definitely gotta do something about that hair!