Quote from: elineq on October 25, 2016, 08:38:01 AM
In a nutshell: society has progressed, and my story is a testament to that. How do you all see this?
Yes, society has progressed, and it's much easier to transition gracefully today than ever before. I certainly don't deny it. But I continue to aver that the experience of non-disclosure is different and more consistent than one that is lived "out," and whether it suits you or not really depends on your perspective, I suppose.
Now, I know what it's like to have that initial acceptance from a group of women -- in one of my social communities, one oriented around charitable work, they all seemed happy to accept me as one of their own. Well, except for one lesbian, who in particular objected to me being in "women's only" spaces, but she was outvoted. And this was all fine and dandy... until someone got angry at me, and then my narrative was used as cudgel to hurt me. "You wouldn't understand that,
would you?" And then personal failings become framed in terms of privilege instead of personal failings.
Even over something as innocuous as a differing opinion on a matter of fashion.
Perhaps it's just a matter of the friends you keep, and where in the world you live. The midwest, for example, is not very forgiving. And it's certainly the truth that being indispensable in your working life is the greatest form of job security -- especially if you can transition gracefully and with minimal disturbance to the status quo. At some point, as a dear friend once said to me, if your womanhood is just so obvious, people will want to help you. This is great for transition! It may not be so great when you get to the other side.
Quote...being stealth is one of my biggest moral obstacles...
Okay, these are a couple of points I have to address. First, the idea that letting go of your past is somehow not "moral." I assume in this respect we are talking about the "truth" as opposed to challenging the notion of transition itself, because elsewhere you talk about your distaste for "hiding."
This all hinges on what you consider to be your truth. My truth is that I'm female. Period. And secondly, I understand that "who I am" does not exist in isolation from other people. I believe we are socially constructed, in large part. A major component of who I am is who I am in the experience of other people. This feedback informs me. So when I say "I am female" I am not engaging in a form of solipsism -- it's something that everyone reflects back to me, too.
So if this is my truth, which is acknowledged by all the people in my life today, why would I try to "hide" that by presenting a narrative that I believe no one (save for other people of similar experience or, indeed, spiritual masters) truly understands? I think the desire to do that, which I had early in my process, comes from not really being over it, not actually having let go of this thing in the past. Unlike Sharon, the more the years go by, the easier and more natural this way of life has become, to the point where it's just simply who I am. For if I'm going to be nostalgic about the past, it's to remind myself that when I was a little girl,
this is the life I envisioned for myself, not one where the most distinguishing characteristic was one of "being trans." That wasn't my truth way back when, and it really isn't today, either.
All that exists is the present. People pretend that the past exists, but it does not, it is long gone. The past is not the truth.
Quote...Being 'stealth' is certainly something I'd like to experience, but will it really be a necessity? Do I want to live in fear?
See, even the term "stealth" is a loaded one. It implies hiding. I do not advocate hiding. I advocate "letting go" and simply being in the present. If the present is unsatisfactory, then I make changes. That's why I transitioned in the first place.
Today, I do not live in fear. I live in joy. When I'm not living in joy, it's because of things like financial stress, or my parents' health, or having gained too much weight, or having to travel too much for work, or being bored with what's on TV, or frustrated by our country's political climate.
Not to say that there isn't a fear that I respect -- for me, it's a fear of
dysphoria. That has always been my demon, the only thing that drove me to the precipice of suicide, twice. I don't feel dysphoria today, which is all to the good. (Dysphoria, by the way, is a superordinate category of negative emotions -- sadness, anger, fear, and disgust, all of which
precede conscious thought, like all emotions.) But what is it that actually caused the dysphoria? To be specific, it was
gender dysphoria. A sense of profound wrongness at being
misgendered, by myself and others. It doesn't happen anymore, because I don't do it to myself anymore, and because no one else does it to me anymore, either, thanks to medical interventions and all kinds of work.
It just doesn't make sense to me to bring that medical history up in cis contexts, for any reason, because it invites misgendering. "Coming out" is a ritual, and its effect is to get people to treat you differently. Which is great at the beginning of transition, or if you're coming out as gay/lesbian/bi etc. But I think it has the opposite effect in terms of the gendering you'll elicit post-transition.
Why on earth would I invite back into my life the possibility of more dysphoria, of possibly re-traumatizing myself? And why on earth would I transgress against my most fundamental truth?
QuoteHowever, bringing up the term 'Post-Traumatic Stress' is quite something. PTSD is a serious thing, and I don't think it's respectful to those who have it to use this term loosely.
As if decades of gender dysphoria isn't a serious thing? Are you actually suggesting that it isn't traumatic, that it might not have lingering after-affects that can be re-triggered? Again, this is something that made me suicidal. I feel perfectly justified in describing its possible after-affects as PTSD.
Again, I always say, it really comes down to our dysphoria. I don't care what identity someone has, if its contradiction doesn't lead to a dysphoric response, I see very little reason to change anything. Conversely, if it makes one dypshoric, address it! As best you can. Now, if such change is beyond your reach, that's another matter entirely, and then strategies have to be employed to make do as best we can.
QuoteBeing a girl doesn't mean I have to neglect that past. Nor do I want to hide it to everybody out there, on the contrary. It has made me the person I am, and I'm so proud of that! This doesn't mean I disclose everything on first sight, I'm acuatually enjoying my life as a woman and I do see that disclosing my story to some might dilute that experience. But when it comes to intimacy, I do want to find people with whom I can share my story, because I think this is exactly what makes me so beautiful 
This is a false choice, I know, but it isn't a false choice when it comes to how the majority of cis people in the world categorize other people. If you had to choose between the identities of "female" and "trans" which would you choose?
Which is more fundamental to the truth of who you are?
If you think your answer is "female" then I strongly encourage you, if you can, to go out in the world -- say, for five years -- without leaning on a trans narrative. See how it differs. I mean, you won't really know one way or another until you experience it. (Also interesting -- how cis people talk about trans people when trans people aren't present.)
Anyways, this experience. Maybe you'll discover that it isn't really you. Maybe you'll discover that it's totally you. Maybe you'll find no difference. I'm not saying what you'll discover, I can only say what I have discovered, but I do promise that there are discoveries to be made, and they will tell you a whole lot about your sense of who you really are regardless of what you find.
Me, I don't consider transition to be "beautiful." Powerful, yes. Insightful, absolutely. But in my experience, I'm at my most beautiful when I somehow manage to be kind, forgiving, empathic, compassionate, responsible, and creative. Which is all about the experiences of others, actually, and really has nothing to do with my own story. (Sure, I was kind, responsible, etc. towards myself through undergoing transition, but self-directed grace can smack of narcissism.)
QuoteI don't think there's just one way to go about it. Being 'stealth' is certainly something I'd like to experience, but will it really be a necessity? Do I want to live in fear? And to get back on topic: hasn't society changed in such a way that it's actually possible to get the acceptance from other women we need without being stealth?
I find "acceptance" to be condescending, something that the oh-so-high-and-mighty cis people bestow upon their favored few, and which can always be revoked if they feel crossed. I never wanted "acceptance," for me it was always about receiving
female gendering. Permanently and unequivocably. Just like every other woman in the world gets, acceptance be damned.
Long before transition, there was this woman who our company hired, Mary. And she was a piece of work. Completely lacking in social grace, completely lacking in kindness, always looking to advance herself and preferably at the expense of others. She was rude, and mean, and quickly made several enemies from her insensitive and hurtful remarks. I'm not sure if she was aware of her emotional impact on other people, or she simply didn't care. Mary was contentious, arrogant, litigious, and her work was shoddy and always past deadline. But the company was afraid of firing her, they needed grounds to get rid of her by their own standards. Luckily, about a year into this woman's reign of terror, she left a very unprofessional and paranoid voice mail with one of our sales reps. Finally! That morning she was escorted out of the building by security, and we had a party in the break room for lunch. Ding dong, the witch is dead, the wicked witch is dead!
Not once was her
gender ever questioned. Not once was this most fundamental fact of her identity ever taken back. Acceptance is nothing compared to a
birthright.