Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

Judge rejects motion to dismiss transgender discrimination case

Started by katia, November 30, 2007, 05:31:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

katia

November 30, 2007, 05:31:16 PM
Judge rejects motion to dismiss transgender discrimination case

http://www.washblade.com/thelatest/thelatest.cfm?blog_id=15466
By LOU CHIBBARO JR.
11/29/2007

""Title VII is violated when an employer discriminates against any employee, transsexual or not, because he or she had failed to act or appear sufficiently masculine or feminine enough for an employer," Robertson stated in a 14-page decision."

  •  

Gabrielle

#1
November 30, 2007, 06:29:42 PM
I'm going to have to watch this case carefully for when I come out at work.
  •  

Kate

#2
November 30, 2007, 07:18:39 PM
Quote from: Katia on November 30, 2007, 05:31:16 PM
""Title VII is violated when an employer discriminates against any employee, transsexual or not, because he or she had failed to act or appear sufficiently masculine or feminine enough for an employer," Robertson stated in a 14-page decision."

Exactly.

Protect us as the normal men and women we are, and NOT as the special-case, minority subclass of psuedo-men/women ENDA attempts to create.

~Kate~
  •  
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions