I found an essay online discussing research on a couple of male to female "cross dressers" and it suggested that the distinction between "transsexual" and "cross dresser" is more of a sliding scale than a Hadrian's Wall separating the two. It makes sense to me because I've never felt like one extreme or the other. I do feel sexy like a cross dresser would when dressed like a girl but I don't understand why some of them feel the need to post pics of their penis in a pair of panties. Even the most sexually open women don't want to see photos like that. Some cross dressers say they identify as feminine on the outside when they cross dress but masculine on the inside. I don't quite fit that. At the other end of the scale, I don't understand transsexuals who send me video clips of very graphic sex change operations from those Faces of Death videos. I don't know why anyone would want to watch that. Nor do I understand when a TS with a male looking face talks about how complete they will feel when they get rid of their penis. I think there is more to a female body than whether there is a penis there or not.
I thought maybe "bigendered" described me but I don't know, that can still be misleading because I don't want to identify as both sexes. Because I was raised to be a male, have a male body, and live in society as a male allows me to understand men better than many women do, I would just rather be a female (and I think I would be a really cool one too).
It is very unlikely that I am one of the only people who is somewhere in the middle of the sliding scale. It is also why I think the transgendered community should junk the solid distinction between CD and TS. I've always been uncomfortable with it because it resembles a caste system.