For anyone still following this thread, I have information to add. I too was very interested in this procedure based on all the previous posts here. I did a lot of other research, including reading the ->-bleeped-<- thread of the woman mentioned in the Pink News article. It sounded great, and Dr. Ting is in-network with my insurance.
I set up a appointments with Dr. Ting's team, including consultations with a social worker, a psychiatrist, and a member of his medical team. Communication was sparse, but when I went to New York everyone was friendly and extremely competent.
However, during the consultation with Dr. Zil Goldstein of the medical team, I found out that the peritoneal method we've been reading about isn't the be-all and end-all that the hype has led us to believe.
My appointment was in the middle of March, and I've been thinking about alternatives. To verify that I truly understood what I was told, I emailed Dr. Goldstein. Here's my message and her reply:
QuoteHello Zil,
Thank you again for our consultation on March 16th. I'd like to verify that I understand clearly the differences between using peritoneal tissue for vaginoplasty versus the standard inversion technique. There seems to be a lot of misinformation being spread, some from one of Doctor Ting's patients.
So, as I understand it from our consultation:
* The peritoneum is taken from the inside of the scrotum, not from the abdomen lining.
* The peritoneum is used only to supplement the scrotal skin as additional graft material, simply for additional depth.
* There are no additional "self-cleaning" or lubrication advantages.
* Post-op dilation schedules are similar with both methods.
The reports I've been reading online indicate that all the above are much better using peritoneal tissue. I'd just like to make sure that I fully understand the pros and cons. If you have anything to add, I would be much appreciative.
-------------------
It seems like you have a good understanding of the procedure. All of that is correct.
Zil Garner Goldstein, FNP-BC
Assistant Professor of Medical Education
Program Director
Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery at Mount Sinai
It's very disappointing, but the only advantage I can see from the way they're doing it at Mt. Sinai (as opposed to the full Davydov method) is the added depth. I was told they can get 9 inches with the additional graft material. That isn't important to me. That, combined with not being able to even meet with Dr. Ting until September, no possibility of surgery before the 2nd quarter of 2019, and the high cost of having to stay in NYC for three weeks, has me looking elsewhere.
I hope somebody finds that information useful.
Stephanie