Susan's Place Logo

News:

Visit our Discord server  and Wiki

Main Menu

Is IPL between sessions helpful?

Started by mako9802, August 05, 2018, 10:06:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mako9802

Just wanted to ask this.   I see these machines and I wonder if they're a good supplement to professional laser session.
  •  

Harley Quinn

I have no experience with IPL. I have heard mixed results from people; some have good results, and some have reported increased hair growth from IPL. I personally wouldn't bother with IPL if you're already doing laser. You can only kill the hair in a growth cycle, and professional laser is much stronger. So you may end up slightly damaging a follicle with the home machine and make the other laser less effective during treatment. I'd ask the laser tech if it were me.
At what point did my life go Looney Tunes? How did it happen? Who's to blame?... Batman, that's who. Batman! It's always been Batman! Ruining my life, spoiling my fun! >:-)
  •  

Sonja

@mako9802 I do IPL at home using a Remington i-Light Pro+ Face & Body, with persistence you can permanently get rid of hair.  I double zap tougher areas and it works well.

Using IPL between hair growth cycles is very handy for 1 main reason - it really really helps if you have fast hair growth and need to deal with severe ingrown hairs - particularly inner upper thighs/ pubic area, and bottom.  By zapping problem areas it stunts the growth to make it more manageable using skin exfoliants, BUT zapping this frequently won't kill the hair follicles more so if you don't get ingrown hairs then its a waste of time. I'm not on hrt and despite exfoliating I still get ingrown hairs because of fast hair growth.

I did 4 sessions if IPL last year and then went on a long holiday period and didn't start it back up till this year, most of the hair did come back, but this time after 8 sessions most hair has been permanently removed. You will find hair that is too fine and downy is not affected. Also hair that is too thick IE front face hair is unaffected because the IPL is not strong enough to kill the hair follicle - although I have permanently got rid of hair on my neck up to jawline (must be thin enough AND I did a double shot - painful but effective ) Interestingly the only hair on my neck is white hairs because they are unaffected by IPL and laser - only electrolysis can get these.

IPL and laser tech is very closely related, strong polarised light at a certain frequency to heat the melanin in the hair follicle and force it to rupture and be permanently damaged. IPL is a spread out beam ideal for legs, arms, feet, hands etc, LASER is a small focused area that usually has a higher power setting (professional grade)- so more effective for tougher face hair, all hair in general BUT slower and more expensive to have done.BUT still cheaper than electrolysis.

Hope this helps,

Sonja.
  •  

LilDevilOfPrada

The real thing you need to consider is skin tone, IPL works best on pure black hair on someone so white you can see the veins, then gets worse performance from their. For instance I cannot use it, I have black hair but a half Indian/white skin tone and that's too dark.
Awww no my little kitten gif site is gone :( sad.


2 Febuary 2011/13 June 2011 hrt began
  •  

yella

I tried IPL for several months, sadly but there is no visible effect
  •  

Kirsteneklund7

Hello everyone,
I'm doing IPL in a commercial salon and I'm not sure of the effectiveness yet. There was enough power to smell burning hair and get the hot needle feeling. Just concerned that I could make more rapid progress with traditional laser. Can anyone elaborate on IPL vs traditional laser?
Regards, Kirsten.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

As a child prayed to be a girl- now the prayer is being answered - 40 years later !
  •  

Harley Quinn

Quote from: Kirsteneklund7 on August 08, 2018, 06:53:22 AM
Hello everyone,
I'm doing IPL in a commercial salon and I'm not sure of the effectiveness yet. There was enough power to smell burning hair and get the hot needle feeling. Just concerned that I could make more rapid progress with traditional laser. Can anyone elaborate on IPL vs traditional laser?
Regards, Kirsten.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk


IPL is broad spectrum and slightly lower intensity, so it doesn't go quite as deep to the root. So it requires more sessions than the alexanderite, yag, or diode. That's about the only difference. I needed to use diode because Alexanderite laser wasn't reaching the roots.
At what point did my life go Looney Tunes? How did it happen? Who's to blame?... Batman, that's who. Batman! It's always been Batman! Ruining my life, spoiling my fun! >:-)
  •  

SammyHatesGreenEggs

The person I see uses the Forever Bare BBL, which is an IPL machine.  It has worked very well for me (most of my facial hair removed in six sessions), but I'm also the exact situation described earlier in the thread (super dark hair, skin so pale you can easily see my veins).

I would be leery of using it if you're already doing laser though.  I'm no dermatologist, but it seems like doing IPL between laser could damage your skin?
  •